Equivalent loading conditions satisfying pressure time history consistency between close-in blast and mass-block impact

Close-in blast tests are plagued by defects such as difficult data measurement, high safety risks, and poor repeatability. A promising method for studying close-in blast is simulating it through impact loading in a laboratory environment. However, current loading equivalence research primarily focuses on reproducing the target plate’s failure mode, with the equivalent criterion adhering to the impulse criterion, which considers only the single contribution of impulse rather than the combined effects of impulse and peak pressure. Few studies have addressed the consistency of pressure time history and the quantitative prediction of equivalent loading conditions between close-in blast and mass-block impact. In this work, the mapping relationship between close-in blast loading conditions and pressure time history parameters is established, based on the fluid-solid coupling model and strong shock wave theory. An incomplete elastic collision model for the mass-block impact is also developed. Peak pressure and impulse transmission are regulated by adjusting impact velocity and mass, while the restitution coefficient and impulse transmission upper limit are determined. Finally, a quantitative prediction method for equivalent loading conditions is proposed. The results show that the pressure time history curves of close-in blast and mass-block impact under equivalent loading conditions exhibit good agreement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Protective Structures
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196251328381
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivalent loading conditions satisfying pressure time history consistency between close-in blast and mass-block impact

Weiming Zhang, Jin‐Shui Yang, Li Ma, Weijing Wang
International Journal of Protective Structures
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Equivalent loading conditions satisfying pressure time history consistency between close-in blast and mass-block impact

Weiming Zhang, Jin‐Shui Yang, Li Ma, Weijing Wang
article en

Abstract

Close-in blast tests are plagued by defects such as difficult data measurement, high safety risks, and poor repeatability. A promising method for studying close-in blast is simulating it through impact loading in a laboratory environment. However, current loading equivalence research primarily focuses on reproducing the target plate’s failure mode, with the equivalent criterion adhering to the impulse criterion, which considers only the single contribution of impulse rather than the combined effects of impulse and peak pressure. Few studies have addressed the consistency of pressure time history and the quantitative prediction of equivalent loading conditions between close-in blast and mass-block impact. In this work, the mapping relationship between close-in blast loading conditions and pressure time history parameters is established, based on the fluid-solid coupling model and strong shock wave theory. An incomplete elastic collision model for the mass-block impact is also developed. Peak pressure and impulse transmission are regulated by adjusting impact velocity and mass, while the restitution coefficient and impulse transmission upper limit are determined. Finally, a quantitative prediction method for equivalent loading conditions is proposed. The results show that the pressure time history curves of close-in blast and mass-block impact under equivalent loading conditions exhibit good agreement.

International Journal of Protective StructuresVol. 16(4)
Harbin Engineering University (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.