Theorising Military Innovation’s Emergence and Effectiveness Across Innovation Timelines

Abstract This conceptual article discusses moderators of the phases of military innovation and their mutual relationship. It examines how factors such as organisational culture, incentives, risk-taking environments, and resource mobilisation impact the different phases in the innovation process. It finds moderators have varying explanatory values across the innovation timeline, influencing both the emergence and effectiveness of innovations. During the invention phase, critical thinking, organisational culture, and incentives drive the generation of innovative ideas. In the incubation phase, political coherence, industrial structure, and lobbying efforts become crucial for advancing these ideas within the military and political bureaucracy. The implementation phase is shaped by strategic culture, political will, and risk appetite, which determine the broader acceptance and execution of innovations. This leads to a detailed expansion of Horowitz and Pindyck’s model of the military innovation process by acknowledging the feedback mechanisms and interdependencies among these factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Review of International Studies
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-11030005
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorising Military Innovation’s Emergence and Effectiveness Across Innovation Timelines

Linus Terhorst
European Review of International Studies
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Theorising Military Innovation’s Emergence and Effectiveness Across Innovation Timelines

Linus Terhorst
article en

Abstract

Abstract This conceptual article discusses moderators of the phases of military innovation and their mutual relationship. It examines how factors such as organisational culture, incentives, risk-taking environments, and resource mobilisation impact the different phases in the innovation process. It finds moderators have varying explanatory values across the innovation timeline, influencing both the emergence and effectiveness of innovations. During the invention phase, critical thinking, organisational culture, and incentives drive the generation of innovative ideas. In the incubation phase, political coherence, industrial structure, and lobbying efforts become crucial for advancing these ideas within the military and political bureaucracy. The implementation phase is shaped by strategic culture, political will, and risk appetite, which determine the broader acceptance and execution of innovations. This leads to a detailed expansion of Horowitz and Pindyck’s model of the military innovation process by acknowledging the feedback mechanisms and interdependencies among these factors.

European Review of International StudiesVol. 11(3)
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.