Synergy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah in Driving Religious Moderation to Achieve Indonesia's SDGs Targets

Objective: This study examines the synergy between the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and Muhammadiyah in promoting religious moderation to contribute to Indonesia’s achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The primary objective is to explore how these three key actors collaborate in fostering moderation and how their efforts align with SDG targets, particularly those focused on peace, justice, and strong institutions (Goal 16). Theoretical Framework: Theoretical frameworks of religious moderation and functionalism guide the study, emphasizing the importance of balanced religious practices in a pluralistic society. Literature Review: The literature review highlights the roles of NU and Muhammadiyah in religious moderation, noting their unique contributions: NU’s inclusive Islam Nusantara approach and Muhammadiyah’s emphasis on Wasathiyah Islam. These frameworks underscore the importance of tolerance, justice, and harmony in national life, aligning with Indonesia’s commitment to promoting peace and reducing social fragmentation. However, studies also point to challenges, such as ideological differences between the two organizations and their relationship with the government, which complicate cross-sector collaboration. Methods: A qualitative research methodology was employed, utilizing interviews, observations, and document studies to gather data from key informants within the Ministry of Religious Affairs, NU, and Muhammadiyah. Thematic and constant comparative analysis were applied to identify key patterns and themes, including the interplay between religious moderation, government policy, and SDG implementation. Results: The research findings reveal that while progress has been made in promoting religious moderation, the lack of effective collaboration between the government and religious organizations remains a significant barrier. NU’s close ideological ties with the government contrast with Muhammadiyah’s critical yet supportive stance, leading to fragmented efforts. This fragmentation hampers the full realization of shared goals, including the achievement of SDGs in Indonesia. Implications: The study’s implications suggest that strengthening cross-sectoral collaboration and aligning organizational efforts are essential for achieving religious harmony and advancing SDG targets. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection of religious moderation and SDGs, offering insights into how religious actors can contribute to sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Profetika Jurnal Studi Islam
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v25i02.8536
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synergy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah in Driving Religious Moderation to Achieve Indonesia's SDGs Targets

Ahmad Asroni, Erham Budi Wiranto, Waston Waston, Sekar Ayu Aryani et al.
1 citations
Profetika Jurnal Studi Islam
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.20
article

Synergy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Nahdlatul Ulama, and Muhammadiyah in Driving Religious Moderation to Achieve Indonesia's SDGs Targets

Ahmad Asroni, Erham Budi Wiranto, Waston Waston, Sekar Ayu Aryani, Muhamad Yusup, Siti Fauziyah
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the synergy between the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), and Muhammadiyah in promoting religious moderation to contribute to Indonesia’s achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The primary objective is to explore how these three key actors collaborate in fostering moderation and how their efforts align with SDG targets, particularly those focused on peace, justice, and strong institutions (Goal 16). Theoretical Framework: Theoretical frameworks of religious moderation and functionalism guide the study, emphasizing the importance of balanced religious practices in a pluralistic society. Literature Review: The literature review highlights the roles of NU and Muhammadiyah in religious moderation, noting their unique contributions: NU’s inclusive Islam Nusantara approach and Muhammadiyah’s emphasis on Wasathiyah Islam. These frameworks underscore the importance of tolerance, justice, and harmony in national life, aligning with Indonesia’s commitment to promoting peace and reducing social fragmentation. However, studies also point to challenges, such as ideological differences between the two organizations and their relationship with the government, which complicate cross-sector collaboration. Methods: A qualitative research methodology was employed, utilizing interviews, observations, and document studies to gather data from key informants within the Ministry of Religious Affairs, NU, and Muhammadiyah. Thematic and constant comparative analysis were applied to identify key patterns and themes, including the interplay between religious moderation, government policy, and SDG implementation. Results: The research findings reveal that while progress has been made in promoting religious moderation, the lack of effective collaboration between the government and religious organizations remains a significant barrier. NU’s close ideological ties with the government contrast with Muhammadiyah’s critical yet supportive stance, leading to fragmented efforts. This fragmentation hampers the full realization of shared goals, including the achievement of SDGs in Indonesia. Implications: The study’s implications suggest that strengthening cross-sectoral collaboration and aligning organizational efforts are essential for achieving religious harmony and advancing SDG targets. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection of religious moderation and SDGs, offering insights into how religious actors can contribute to sustainable development.

Profetika Jurnal Studi IslamVol. 25(02)
Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta (ID), Islamic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.