Understanding haze data contestations in Singapore: between accuracy and affect

This article examines the complex relationship between the sensorial experience of the haze and the dynamics of public contestations over official haze data, drawing on the example of the citizen-developed haze data during the 2013–2019 haze period in Singapore. This article qualitatively analysed posts on Reddit to understand how users translated their sensorial and affective experiences into contestable, subjective, and legitimate haze data. This article argues that these experiences generated alternative data in the form of ‘counterdata’ through the collective validation of individual sensorial experiences online. Importantly, these sensorial and affective experiences did not just generate more data to understand the city’s air pollution levels. These experiences revealed the social constructedness of data and data infrastructures within the context of the institutional hegemony over data and functioned as a mechanism through which the political discourse in the city-state was broadened.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sociology
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2025.2479055
Primary Topic
COVID-19 impact on air quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding haze data contestations in Singapore: between accuracy and affect

Nadeem Hussain
Environmental Sociology
COVID-19 impact on air quality
article

Understanding haze data contestations in Singapore: between accuracy and affect

Nadeem Hussain
article en

Abstract

This article examines the complex relationship between the sensorial experience of the haze and the dynamics of public contestations over official haze data, drawing on the example of the citizen-developed haze data during the 2013–2019 haze period in Singapore. This article qualitatively analysed posts on Reddit to understand how users translated their sensorial and affective experiences into contestable, subjective, and legitimate haze data. This article argues that these experiences generated alternative data in the form of ‘counterdata’ through the collective validation of individual sensorial experiences online. Importantly, these sensorial and affective experiences did not just generate more data to understand the city’s air pollution levels. These experiences revealed the social constructedness of data and data infrastructures within the context of the institutional hegemony over data and functioned as a mechanism through which the political discourse in the city-state was broadened.

Environmental SociologyVol. 12(1)
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
COVID-19 impact on air quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.