Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight resolved blood flow index: times-of-flight beyond 1 ns permit selective measurement of pulsatile cerebral blood flow

Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight (ToF) resolved blood flow index (BFI) are presented. These simulations are validated against continuous-wave (CW) and ToF-resolved BFI measurements in phantoms and in-vivo. We use these simulations to directly compare the benefits of ToF gating and increasing source-detector separation (SDS) for a range of acquisition rates and demonstrate that ToF gating at 920 ps or later provides superior brain selectivity to CW methods at 30 mm SDS. To recover a BFI signal that better represents the brain pulse than the scalp pulse requires a ToF ⪆1 ns. Brain selectivity for both CW and TD devices is highest when the minimum resolvable autocorrelation lag is below 1 μ𝑠 and rapidly diminishes if the minimum lag exceeds 10 μ𝑠.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3041271
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight resolved blood flow index: times-of-flight beyond 1 ns permit selective measurement of pulsatile cerebral blood flow

Alexander Ruesch, Dominic Hill, Octave Etard, Rachel Prudden et al.
1 citations
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
1.36
article

Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight resolved blood flow index: times-of-flight beyond 1 ns permit selective measurement of pulsatile cerebral blood flow

Alexander Ruesch, Dominic Hill, Octave Etard, Rachel Prudden, Matthew T. Valley, Robert J. Cooper, Anurag Behera, Dawid Borycki, Stella Avtzi, Yuqian Zhang, Alex Antrobus, Alexandra Tran-Van-Minh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight (ToF) resolved blood flow index (BFI) are presented. These simulations are validated against continuous-wave (CW) and ToF-resolved BFI measurements in phantoms and in-vivo. We use these simulations to directly compare the benefits of ToF gating and increasing source-detector separation (SDS) for a range of acquisition rates and demonstrate that ToF gating at 920 ps or later provides superior brain selectivity to CW methods at 30 mm SDS. To recover a BFI signal that better represents the brain pulse than the scalp pulse requires a ToF ⪆1 ns. Brain selectivity for both CW and TD devices is highest when the minimum resolvable autocorrelation lag is below 1 μ𝑠 and rapidly diminishes if the minimum lag exceeds 10 μ𝑠.

CCm Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.