From plough to portfolio: Occupational diversification of farmers in Odisha

Growing uncertainties in rural farming raise concerns about sustainability, prompting interest in diversification. While farmers recognize its benefits, many underutilize it, emphasizing the need to evaluate occupational diversification practices. The study attempts to answer two prominent questions, such as ‘What are the areas (range) of different occupations under different categories undertaken along with the degree to which they are diversifying across the existing categories of farmers? Odisha's Khordha and Sambalpur districts were the focus of the investigation. These districts have the highest population density of end consumers and the widest range of activities that farmers do, which makes them great places for diversification. Data were gathered through personal interviews, employing pre-tested semi-structured questionnaires. The survey analyzed the nature of occupational diversification among farmers, while Simpson’s index of diversification measured the extent of this diversification. The majority expressed occupational preference for agriculture (96.67%) and animal husbandry (64.17%) under the farm category, transportation (26.25%) and input suppliers (20.42%) under the off-farm category, followed by formal employment (36.66%) and renting activities (33.75%) under the non-farm category. The participation of marginal, small, and medium-sized farmers varied across these sectors. Most respondents (48.33%) pursued only one occupation, with others engaging in two (35.83%), three (11.67%), or four (4.17%) occupations. The majority expressed a moderate extent of diversification, whereby, in magnitude, branching out from their conventional way of monoculture within the farm category by 16.25 percent, followed by off-farm (15.42 percent) and non-farm (20.00 percent). Farmers participate in varied on-farm, off-farm, and non-farm activities, with moderate diversification prevalent among smallholders. Increasing non-farm participation offers stability but raises ecological concerns, risking resource depletion, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation in rural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment Conservation Journal
Published
2024-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36953/ecj.28962912
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From plough to portfolio: Occupational diversification of farmers in Odisha

Debi Kalyan Jayasingh, Bishnupriya Mishra, Houari Moulay Ali, Kamalakanta Behera
Environment Conservation Journal
Agricultural Economics and Practices
article

From plough to portfolio: Occupational diversification of farmers in Odisha

Debi Kalyan Jayasingh, Bishnupriya Mishra, Houari Moulay Ali, Kamalakanta Behera
article en

Abstract

Growing uncertainties in rural farming raise concerns about sustainability, prompting interest in diversification. While farmers recognize its benefits, many underutilize it, emphasizing the need to evaluate occupational diversification practices. The study attempts to answer two prominent questions, such as ‘What are the areas (range) of different occupations under different categories undertaken along with the degree to which they are diversifying across the existing categories of farmers? Odisha's Khordha and Sambalpur districts were the focus of the investigation. These districts have the highest population density of end consumers and the widest range of activities that farmers do, which makes them great places for diversification. Data were gathered through personal interviews, employing pre-tested semi-structured questionnaires. The survey analyzed the nature of occupational diversification among farmers, while Simpson’s index of diversification measured the extent of this diversification. The majority expressed occupational preference for agriculture (96.67%) and animal husbandry (64.17%) under the farm category, transportation (26.25%) and input suppliers (20.42%) under the off-farm category, followed by formal employment (36.66%) and renting activities (33.75%) under the non-farm category. The participation of marginal, small, and medium-sized farmers varied across these sectors. Most respondents (48.33%) pursued only one occupation, with others engaging in two (35.83%), three (11.67%), or four (4.17%) occupations. The majority expressed a moderate extent of diversification, whereby, in magnitude, branching out from their conventional way of monoculture within the farm category by 16.25 percent, followed by off-farm (15.42 percent) and non-farm (20.00 percent). Farmers participate in varied on-farm, off-farm, and non-farm activities, with moderate diversification prevalent among smallholders. Increasing non-farm participation offers stability but raises ecological concerns, risking resource depletion, biodiversity loss, and environmental degradation in rural contexts.

Environment Conservation JournalVol. 26(1)
Fakir Mohan University (IN), Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (IN), Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ghatkhed Amravati (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Agricultural Economics and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.