COMPARISON OF QUANTUM DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

Nowadays, with the discovery of the power and potential of quantum computers, developing and understanding quantum-based deep learning models has become an important research area. This study investigates Quantum Transfer Learning and Quantum Hybrid Learning models that involve feature extraction and training processes using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT). The study aims to explore the potential advantages and differences of quantum deep learning techniques. It is envisioned that quantum computing can provide significant advantages in terms of computational speed and efficiency, especially in complex and large-scale data sets. Therefore, this study will contribute to a better understanding of the practical applications and potential impacts of quantum deep learning techniques. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four different quantum deep learning architectures using two different datasets. The classifiers used are the pre-trained ResNet-50 with a kernel size of 5x5 and the state-of-the-art CaiT-24-XXS-224 (CaiT) transducers. Optimization was performed with Adam optimizer using the cross entropy loss function. A total of eight models were trained, each with ten iterations. Accuracy (Acc), balanced accuracy (BA), overall F𝛽 (F_beta) macro score F1 and F2, Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC), sensitivity (Sens) and specificity (Spec) were used as performance measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.1553326
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF QUANTUM DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

Güncel Sarıman, Bekir Eray Katı, Ecir Uğur Küçüksille
1 citations
Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
article

COMPARISON OF QUANTUM DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

Güncel Sarıman, Bekir Eray Katı, Ecir Uğur Küçüksille
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Nowadays, with the discovery of the power and potential of quantum computers, developing and understanding quantum-based deep learning models has become an important research area. This study investigates Quantum Transfer Learning and Quantum Hybrid Learning models that involve feature extraction and training processes using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT). The study aims to explore the potential advantages and differences of quantum deep learning techniques. It is envisioned that quantum computing can provide significant advantages in terms of computational speed and efficiency, especially in complex and large-scale data sets. Therefore, this study will contribute to a better understanding of the practical applications and potential impacts of quantum deep learning techniques. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four different quantum deep learning architectures using two different datasets. The classifiers used are the pre-trained ResNet-50 with a kernel size of 5x5 and the state-of-the-art CaiT-24-XXS-224 (CaiT) transducers. Optimization was performed with Adam optimizer using the cross entropy loss function. A total of eight models were trained, each with ten iterations. Accuracy (Acc), balanced accuracy (BA), overall F𝛽 (F_beta) macro score F1 and F2, Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC), sensitivity (Sens) and specificity (Spec) were used as performance measures.

Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım DergisiVol. 13(1)
Suleyman Demirel University (KZ), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.