Exploring High School Teachers' Responses to High School Credit Policies

The objective of this study was to examine the responses of high school teachers to the high school credit system. To this end, focus group interviews were conducted with nine teachers, divided into three groups: one comprising teachers from general high schools (public and private), and two comprising teachers from Meister high schools. The interviews revealed that teachers' responses could be classified into three categories: passive acceptance, making do, and active acceptance. The background or causal domain could be further subdivided into three subcategories: concerns about policies, contradictions and conflicts between policies, and drivers of implementation. Each theme is further subdivided into sub-themes, with the exception of passive and active acceptance (in the Idealised Responses category) and policy contradictions and conflicts (in the Background and Causes category). Based on the results of the analysis, the following implications were drawn: the complexity of policy responses at school sites, alignment based on educational will, and enhancing policy coherence by analysing the causes of responses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Research Institute
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34245/jed.44.4.951
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring High School Teachers' Responses to High School Credit Policies

Eun-Jung Hur, danbe Lee, Chan Park, So Jin Kim
Educational Research Institute
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
article

Exploring High School Teachers' Responses to High School Credit Policies

Eun-Jung Hur, danbe Lee, Chan Park, So Jin Kim
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the responses of high school teachers to the high school credit system. To this end, focus group interviews were conducted with nine teachers, divided into three groups: one comprising teachers from general high schools (public and private), and two comprising teachers from Meister high schools. The interviews revealed that teachers' responses could be classified into three categories: passive acceptance, making do, and active acceptance. The background or causal domain could be further subdivided into three subcategories: concerns about policies, contradictions and conflicts between policies, and drivers of implementation. Each theme is further subdivided into sub-themes, with the exception of passive and active acceptance (in the Idealised Responses category) and policy contradictions and conflicts (in the Background and Causes category). Based on the results of the analysis, the following implications were drawn: the complexity of policy responses at school sites, alignment based on educational will, and enhancing policy coherence by analysing the causes of responses.

Educational Research InstituteVol. 44(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring High School Teachers' Responses to High School Credit Policies — Eun-Jung Hur, danbe Lee, et al. · Educational Research Institute (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS