The bodies of pornographic cinema: a study against theoretical and methodological simplification

This paper points out the abundance and diversity of films included under the label of pornographic cinema; in this sense, the author argues that the bodies represented there should not be grouped into a timeless and ubiquitous image.To make these differences evident, a review is offered of three of the bodies that intervene in pornographic cinema: a) the actor, who exposes himself naked in front of the camera; b) the spectator, whose stimulation can lead to sexual activity; c) the film, whose frames focus the gaze on certain parts of the human body.This review allows us to notice the profound generic difference that exists between the bodies represented but also sheds light on the ethnic and physiognomic differences that constitute an important part of this type of cinema.The conclusions of this work are far from putting an end to a collective discussion but they contribute to dialogue in a reasoned manner.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tramas Subjetividad y procesos sociales
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24275/tramas/uamx/202462277-294
Primary Topic
Cinema and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The bodies of pornographic cinema: a study against theoretical and methodological simplification

Manuel Almazán
Tramas Subjetividad y procesos sociales
Cinema and Media Studies
article

The bodies of pornographic cinema: a study against theoretical and methodological simplification

Manuel Almazán
article en

Abstract

This paper points out the abundance and diversity of films included under the label of pornographic cinema; in this sense, the author argues that the bodies represented there should not be grouped into a timeless and ubiquitous image.To make these differences evident, a review is offered of three of the bodies that intervene in pornographic cinema: a) the actor, who exposes himself naked in front of the camera; b) the spectator, whose stimulation can lead to sexual activity; c) the film, whose frames focus the gaze on certain parts of the human body.This review allows us to notice the profound generic difference that exists between the bodies represented but also sheds light on the ethnic and physiognomic differences that constitute an important part of this type of cinema.The conclusions of this work are far from putting an end to a collective discussion but they contribute to dialogue in a reasoned manner.

Tramas Subjetividad y procesos sociales(62)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cinema and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.