Effect of Different Types of Malocclusions on Maximum Bite Force in an Iranian Population

Background: Limited studies are available on how different malocclusion types and associated factors influence maximum bite force (MBF). Thus, this study aimed to assess the effect of the types of malocclusion, overbite, and overjet on MBF in an Iranian population. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study involved 80 participants with no prior orthodontic treatments or jaw surgeries. The type of malocclusion of the participants was determined, and their overjet and overbite were measured. Their MBF was also measured by a strain gauge. The date were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and LSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results: The mean MBF was 386.24 N in the study population (range 197 to 701 N). The mean MBF was 413.38 N, 381.11 N, and 165.33 N in Class I, Class II, and Class III patients, respectively (P<0.05). Class III patients exhibited significantly lower MBF compared to the other groups (P<0.05). Overjet and overbite had significant effects on the MBF (P<0.05). The decreased overjet group showed significantly lower MBF compared to both the normal overjet (P = 0.028) and increased overjet groups (P = 0.011). Similarly, the deep bite (P = 0.041) and edge-to-edge bite groups (P = 0.02) had significantly lower MBF compared to the normal bite group. Conclusion: The results indicated that malocclusion type significantly influenced the MBF of the study participants, with Class III patients demonstrating notably lower MBF compared to other groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Galen Medical Journal
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13isp1.3601
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Different Types of Malocclusions on Maximum Bite Force in an Iranian Population

Abbas Salehi Vaziri, Atefe Ahmadvand, Ali Noie Alamdari
Galen Medical Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Effect of Different Types of Malocclusions on Maximum Bite Force in an Iranian Population

Abbas Salehi Vaziri, Atefe Ahmadvand, Ali Noie Alamdari
article en

Abstract

Background: Limited studies are available on how different malocclusion types and associated factors influence maximum bite force (MBF). Thus, this study aimed to assess the effect of the types of malocclusion, overbite, and overjet on MBF in an Iranian population. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study involved 80 participants with no prior orthodontic treatments or jaw surgeries. The type of malocclusion of the participants was determined, and their overjet and overbite were measured. Their MBF was also measured by a strain gauge. The date were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and LSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results: The mean MBF was 386.24 N in the study population (range 197 to 701 N). The mean MBF was 413.38 N, 381.11 N, and 165.33 N in Class I, Class II, and Class III patients, respectively (P<0.05). Class III patients exhibited significantly lower MBF compared to the other groups (P<0.05). Overjet and overbite had significant effects on the MBF (P<0.05). The decreased overjet group showed significantly lower MBF compared to both the normal overjet (P = 0.028) and increased overjet groups (P = 0.011). Similarly, the deep bite (P = 0.041) and edge-to-edge bite groups (P = 0.02) had significantly lower MBF compared to the normal bite group. Conclusion: The results indicated that malocclusion type significantly influenced the MBF of the study participants, with Class III patients demonstrating notably lower MBF compared to other groups.

Galen Medical JournalVol. 13(SP1)
Shahed University (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.