The predictive power of postoperative complications and the agreement between PG-SGA SF and GLIM in identifying malnourishment in patients with pancreatic diseases before pancreatic surgery

<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background</h3> Patients with pancreatic diseases impose several nutritional challenges and identifying malnourished patients is important since malnutrition may increase the risk of postoperative complications. <h3>Aims</h3> To assess the agreement between Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in identifying malnutrition in patients with pancreatic diseases scheduled for elective surgery. To investigate whether there is an association between malnutrition and postoperative complications. <h3>Methods</h3> A secondary analysis of a prospective observational cross-sectional study in patients with pancreatic diseases undergoing pancreatic surgery from September 2017 to January 2018 at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Nutritional screening was performed by PG-SGA SF and malnutrition diagnosis was defined by GLIM with and without prior screening. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 34 patients were included (16 men, 18 women), median age 70 (range 38–83) years, median BMI 24.4 (range 19.3–40.4) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Risk of malnutrition was detected in 14 patients (41 %) by PG-SGA SF. Malnutrition was detected in 9 patients (26 %) by GLIM with prior screening (GLIM + screening) and in 17 patients (50 %) by GLIM without prior screening (GLIM - screening). The agreement between PG-SGA SF and GLIM - screening was 62 %, the sensitivity 64 %, the specificity 60 %, and the Cohen's kappa was 0.235, <i>P</i>=0.08. GLIM - screening had a positive predictive value of 53 % and negative predictive value of 71 %. A total of 14 patients had postoperative complications. The GLIM - screening showed a RR of 1.40 (CI: 0.58–3.37) of postoperative complications when being malnourished. The GLIM + screening showed a RR of 1.66 (CI: 0.49–5.61) of postoperative complications when being malnourished. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study showed that PG-SGA SF and GLIM had a slight to fair agreement in detecting malnutrition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. No firm conclusions in predicting postoperative complications could be found.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutos.2025.03.005
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The predictive power of postoperative complications and the agreement between PG-SGA SF and GLIM in identifying malnourishment in patients with pancreatic diseases before pancreatic surgery

Folke Hammarqvist, Lars Ellegård, Marie Njerve Olsen, Randi Tobberup et al.
Clinical Nutrition Open Science
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

The predictive power of postoperative complications and the agreement between PG-SGA SF and GLIM in identifying malnourishment in patients with pancreatic diseases before pancreatic surgery

Folke Hammarqvist, Lars Ellegård, Marie Njerve Olsen, Randi Tobberup, Shawna L. Ehlers, Mia Solholt Godthaab Brath, M. Petrolo, Elena Rangelova, Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen
article en

Abstract

<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background</h3> Patients with pancreatic diseases impose several nutritional challenges and identifying malnourished patients is important since malnutrition may increase the risk of postoperative complications. <h3>Aims</h3> To assess the agreement between Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria in identifying malnutrition in patients with pancreatic diseases scheduled for elective surgery. To investigate whether there is an association between malnutrition and postoperative complications. <h3>Methods</h3> A secondary analysis of a prospective observational cross-sectional study in patients with pancreatic diseases undergoing pancreatic surgery from September 2017 to January 2018 at Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden). Nutritional screening was performed by PG-SGA SF and malnutrition diagnosis was defined by GLIM with and without prior screening. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 34 patients were included (16 men, 18 women), median age 70 (range 38–83) years, median BMI 24.4 (range 19.3–40.4) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Risk of malnutrition was detected in 14 patients (41 %) by PG-SGA SF. Malnutrition was detected in 9 patients (26 %) by GLIM with prior screening (GLIM + screening) and in 17 patients (50 %) by GLIM without prior screening (GLIM - screening). The agreement between PG-SGA SF and GLIM - screening was 62 %, the sensitivity 64 %, the specificity 60 %, and the Cohen's kappa was 0.235, <i>P</i>=0.08. GLIM - screening had a positive predictive value of 53 % and negative predictive value of 71 %. A total of 14 patients had postoperative complications. The GLIM - screening showed a RR of 1.40 (CI: 0.58–3.37) of postoperative complications when being malnourished. The GLIM + screening showed a RR of 1.66 (CI: 0.49–5.61) of postoperative complications when being malnourished. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This study showed that PG-SGA SF and GLIM had a slight to fair agreement in detecting malnutrition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. No firm conclusions in predicting postoperative complications could be found.

Clinical Nutrition Open ScienceVol. 61
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Capital Region of Denmark (DK), University of Bergen (NO), University of Gothenburg (SE), Aalborg University (DK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.