Vestibular implant stimulation: pulse amplitude modulation versus combined pulse rate and amplitude modulation

<i>Objective</i>. The vestibular implant is a potential treatment approach for bilateral vestibulopathy patients. To restore gaze stabilization, the implant should elicit vestibulo-ocular reflexes (VORs) over a wide range of eye velocities. Different stimulation strategies to achieve this goal were previously described. Vestibular information can be encoded by modulating stimulation amplitude, rate, or a combination of both. In this study, combined rate and amplitude modulation was compared with amplitude modulation, to evaluate their potential for vestibular implant stimulation.<i>Approach</i>. Nine subjects with a vestibulo-cochlear implant participated in this study. Three stimulation strategies were tested. The combined rate and amplitude modulation setting (baseline rate 50%) was compared with amplitude modulation (baseline rate 50%, and baseline rate equal to the maximum rate). The resulting VOR was evaluated.<i>Main results</i>. Combining rate and amplitude modulation, or using amplitude modulation with a baseline equal to the maximum rate, both significantly increased peak eye velocities (PEVs). Misalignment increased with higher PEVs and higher pulse rate. No significant differences were found in PEVs and misalignment, between both stimulation strategies. Amplitude modulation with a baseline rate at 50%, demonstrated the lowest PEVs.<i>Significance</i>. Combining rate and amplitude modulation, or amplitude modulation with a baseline equal to the maximum rate, can both be considered for future vestibular implant fitting.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04918745.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adc33a
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vestibular implant stimulation: pulse amplitude modulation versus combined pulse rate and amplitude modulation

Nils Guinand, Benjamin Volpe, Raymond van de Berg, Bernd L. Vermorken et al.
2 citations
Journal of Neural Engineering
Vestibular and auditory disorders
1.68
article

Vestibular implant stimulation: pulse amplitude modulation versus combined pulse rate and amplitude modulation

Nils Guinand, Benjamin Volpe, Raymond van de Berg, Bernd L. Vermorken, Stan C J van Boxel, Elke Devocht, Angélica Pérez Fornos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. The vestibular implant is a potential treatment approach for bilateral vestibulopathy patients. To restore gaze stabilization, the implant should elicit vestibulo-ocular reflexes (VORs) over a wide range of eye velocities. Different stimulation strategies to achieve this goal were previously described. Vestibular information can be encoded by modulating stimulation amplitude, rate, or a combination of both. In this study, combined rate and amplitude modulation was compared with amplitude modulation, to evaluate their potential for vestibular implant stimulation.<i>Approach</i>. Nine subjects with a vestibulo-cochlear implant participated in this study. Three stimulation strategies were tested. The combined rate and amplitude modulation setting (baseline rate 50%) was compared with amplitude modulation (baseline rate 50%, and baseline rate equal to the maximum rate). The resulting VOR was evaluated.<i>Main results</i>. Combining rate and amplitude modulation, or using amplitude modulation with a baseline equal to the maximum rate, both significantly increased peak eye velocities (PEVs). Misalignment increased with higher PEVs and higher pulse rate. No significant differences were found in PEVs and misalignment, between both stimulation strategies. Amplitude modulation with a baseline rate at 50%, demonstrated the lowest PEVs.<i>Significance</i>. Combining rate and amplitude modulation, or amplitude modulation with a baseline equal to the maximum rate, can both be considered for future vestibular implant fitting.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04918745.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 22(2)
University of Geneva (CH), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Maastricht University (NL), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
ZonMw, Stichting De Weijerhorst, MED-EL Medical Electronics
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.