Measuring productivity in the open economy: Törnqvist perspectives

Abstract In this paper, we use a simple model of the production sector of an open economy to derive several Törnqvist measures of technological change, each one describing the same phenomenon, but from a different perspective. We argue that each one is legitimate in its own right, but that it is important to be aware of their differences in order to be able to reconcile them. While Törnqvist indices are superlative indices, they do not satisfy the factor reversal test. This can be viewed as a minor flaw, but it nevertheless is somewhat unsatisfactory for our work since it requires the making of arbitrary choices. We therefore propose a symmetric version of the Törnqvist index that satisfies the test, and which enables us to reduce the number of truly distinct perspectives. We furthermore show how these indices of technological change relate to average labour productivity measures, most of which also reflect changes in input and/or output mixes over time. We argue that in principle average labour productivity is a useful concept, but most of these ratios are inadequate as measures of technological change since their numerators and denominators are typically inconsistent with one another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-025-00756-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Economic Growth and Productivity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring productivity in the open economy: Törnqvist perspectives

Ulrich Kohli
2 citations
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Economic Growth and Productivity
6.26
article

Measuring productivity in the open economy: Törnqvist perspectives

Ulrich Kohli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we use a simple model of the production sector of an open economy to derive several Törnqvist measures of technological change, each one describing the same phenomenon, but from a different perspective. We argue that each one is legitimate in its own right, but that it is important to be aware of their differences in order to be able to reconcile them. While Törnqvist indices are superlative indices, they do not satisfy the factor reversal test. This can be viewed as a minor flaw, but it nevertheless is somewhat unsatisfactory for our work since it requires the making of arbitrary choices. We therefore propose a symmetric version of the Törnqvist index that satisfies the test, and which enables us to reduce the number of truly distinct perspectives. We furthermore show how these indices of technological change relate to average labour productivity measures, most of which also reflect changes in input and/or output mixes over time. We argue that in principle average labour productivity is a useful concept, but most of these ratios are inadequate as measures of technological change since their numerators and denominators are typically inconsistent with one another.

Journal of Productivity AnalysisVol. 64(1)
University of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic Growth and Productivity
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.