Comparative study of the effects of methionine and tartaric acid in sulfuric acid anodizing

This work investigates the comparative analysis of anodic oxide films formed in sulfuric acid with and without tartaric acid or methionine. The corrosion performance was evaluated using immersion and salt spray tests complemented by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results indicated that the addition of tartaric acid or methionine in a sulfuric acid bath led to a lower anodizing current density, a thinner oxide layer, and more ordered surface morphology. Additionally, glow-discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES) analysis suggests the incorporation of methionine components in the anodized layer, which provides active inhibition during corrosion tests. The tartaric acid and methionine-based anodic oxides presented a higher corrosion performance than anodic oxides formed in sulfuric acid without additives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100592
Primary Topic
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of the effects of methionine and tartaric acid in sulfuric acid anodizing

Bashir Jelani Usman, Uyime Donatus
Next Materials
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
article

Comparative study of the effects of methionine and tartaric acid in sulfuric acid anodizing

Bashir Jelani Usman, Uyime Donatus
article en

Abstract

This work investigates the comparative analysis of anodic oxide films formed in sulfuric acid with and without tartaric acid or methionine. The corrosion performance was evaluated using immersion and salt spray tests complemented by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results indicated that the addition of tartaric acid or methionine in a sulfuric acid bath led to a lower anodizing current density, a thinner oxide layer, and more ordered surface morphology. Additionally, glow-discharge optical emission spectroscopy (GDOES) analysis suggests the incorporation of methionine components in the anodized layer, which provides active inhibition during corrosion tests. The tartaric acid and methionine-based anodic oxides presented a higher corrosion performance than anodic oxides formed in sulfuric acid without additives.

Next MaterialsVol. 8
University of Manchester (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study of the effects of methionine and tartaric acid in sulfuric acid anodizing — Bashir Jelani Usman, Uyime Donatus · Next Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS