Estimated dose–response relationship between impulse noise exposure and temporary threshold shift in tactical training environments

Impulse noise and repetitive low-level blast exposure are routine occupational risks for certain populations of military and law enforcement personnel, yet the effects on human hearing are not fully understood. This study evaluated the hearing of 214 service members before and after tactical exercises using boothless audiometers in the field. Training involved weapons systems that generated high levels of impulse noise measured with wearable dosimeters. The impulse waveforms were analyzed to predict the probability of temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) based on various risk criteria. The LAeq,8h predicted TTS events with 64% accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 0.70) on held-out participants using leave-one-out cross-validation. Adding kurtosis improved accuracy to 66% (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 0.75). Peak sound level and the Auditory Hazard Assessment Algorithm for Humans model were substantially less accurate predictors of TTS events. A dose-response curve generated using logistic regression indicated a greater likelihood of TTS with increasing cumulative noise exposure. These findings support the use of energy-based auditory risk criteria for impulse noise. However, additional validation data are needed to determine the quantitative risk of short- and long-term hearing damage associated with a given level of impulse noise exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0036149
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimated dose–response relationship between impulse noise exposure and temporary threshold shift in tactical training environments

Christopher J. Smalt, Andrea Brzuska, Jeffrey Russell, Devon Kulinski et al.
2 citations
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Noise Effects and Management
6.24
article

Estimated dose–response relationship between impulse noise exposure and temporary threshold shift in tactical training environments

Christopher J. Smalt, Andrea Brzuska, Jeffrey Russell, Devon Kulinski, Quintin Hecht, Douglas S. Brungart, Walter S. Carr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Impulse noise and repetitive low-level blast exposure are routine occupational risks for certain populations of military and law enforcement personnel, yet the effects on human hearing are not fully understood. This study evaluated the hearing of 214 service members before and after tactical exercises using boothless audiometers in the field. Training involved weapons systems that generated high levels of impulse noise measured with wearable dosimeters. The impulse waveforms were analyzed to predict the probability of temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) based on various risk criteria. The LAeq,8h predicted TTS events with 64% accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 0.70) on held-out participants using leave-one-out cross-validation. Adding kurtosis improved accuracy to 66% (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve = 0.75). Peak sound level and the Auditory Hazard Assessment Algorithm for Humans model were substantially less accurate predictors of TTS events. A dose-response curve generated using logistic regression indicated a greater likelihood of TTS with increasing cumulative noise exposure. These findings support the use of energy-based auditory risk criteria for impulse noise. However, additional validation data are needed to determine the quantitative risk of short- and long-term hearing damage associated with a given level of impulse noise exposure.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaVol. 157(3)
Defense Health Agency (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), MIT Lincoln Laboratory (US), Joint Base San Antonio (US), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Noise Effects and Management
6.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.