Assessment of planar NDE methods for damage in open hole carbon fibre laminates

This study evaluates the sensitivity of non-destructive imaging methods to characterise in-plane (delaminations) and out-of-plane (matrix cracking/splitting) damage in open-hole carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) angle-ply specimens as a function of tensile loading to 86% and 97% of the ultimate tensile stress (UTS). Ultrasound, X-ray radiography (with and without contrast agent), and X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCi) are compared against X-ray computed tomography (XCT). XPCi shows good sensitivity to out-of-plane (transverse) matrix cracks without the need for a contrast agent but has limited ability to assess in-plane delaminations. Conversely, ultrasonic C-scan demonstrated good accuracy for the quantification and depth estimation of in-plane delaminations, being comparable to segmented XCT data. A combination of ultrasound and XPCi could potentially allow planar NDE of delamination and matrix cracking without the access, throughput, and size limitations inherent in computed tomography or the need for invasive and expensive contrast agents required for radiographic imaging. • Capability of computed tomography, ultrasound, radiography and phase contrast imaging evaluated. • X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCi) is sensitive to matrix cracks without contrast agent. • UT maps delamination but not matrix cracks. • Combining XPCi and UT effective planar NDE solution, overcoming XCT size limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NDT & E International
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103393
Primary Topic
Optical measurement and interference techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of planar NDE methods for damage in open hole carbon fibre laminates

Paul Fromme, Adam Doherty, Alan L. Clarke, Philip J. Withers et al.
4 links
NDT & E International
Optical measurement and interference techniques
article

Assessment of planar NDE methods for damage in open hole carbon fibre laminates

Paul Fromme, Adam Doherty, Alan L. Clarke, Philip J. Withers, Neha Chandarana, Ollie Helps, Christopher I. Thornton
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the sensitivity of non-destructive imaging methods to characterise in-plane (delaminations) and out-of-plane (matrix cracking/splitting) damage in open-hole carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) angle-ply specimens as a function of tensile loading to 86% and 97% of the ultimate tensile stress (UTS). Ultrasound, X-ray radiography (with and without contrast agent), and X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCi) are compared against X-ray computed tomography (XCT). XPCi shows good sensitivity to out-of-plane (transverse) matrix cracks without the need for a contrast agent but has limited ability to assess in-plane delaminations. Conversely, ultrasonic C-scan demonstrated good accuracy for the quantification and depth estimation of in-plane delaminations, being comparable to segmented XCT data. A combination of ultrasound and XPCi could potentially allow planar NDE of delamination and matrix cracking without the access, throughput, and size limitations inherent in computed tomography or the need for invasive and expensive contrast agents required for radiographic imaging. • Capability of computed tomography, ultrasound, radiography and phase contrast imaging evaluated. • X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCi) is sensitive to matrix cracks without contrast agent. • UT maps delamination but not matrix cracks. • Combining XPCi and UT effective planar NDE solution, overcoming XCT size limitations.

NDT & E InternationalVol. 154
The Francis Crick Institute (GB), Neath Port Talbot Hospital (GB), Henry Royce Institute (GB), University of Bristol (GB), National Composites Centre (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Optical measurement and interference techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.