Cognitive Biases and Entrepreneurial Decision-Making in Equity Crowdfunding: Implications for Economic Growth and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 8)

Objective: This study investigates the influence of cognitive biases on startup entrepreneurs' decision-making processes in equity crowdfunding (ECF), a rapidly growing funding mechanism. It explores how cognitive biases manifest among startup entrepreneurs during ECF campaigns and analyses the implications of these biases for funding decisions and long-term startup sustainability and contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth). Theoretical Framework: Grounded in frameworks of Bounded Rationality, Prospect Theory, and Entrepreneurial Cognition, it examines the impact of six key biases: overconfidence, optimism, planning fallacy, anchoring, availability, and representativeness, on strategic decisions during ECF campaigns. Method: Utilising semi-structured interviews with 10 startup entrepreneurs across various industries, thematic analysis was employed to identify heuristic-driven behaviours and their implications. Results and Discussion: The study identifies six cognitive biases affecting ECF decisions. Overconfidence and optimism inflate targets and hinder adaptability while planning fallacy and anchoring cause misaligned strategies. Availability and representativeness biases lead to misapplied approaches, impacting campaign success and startup sustainability. These findings highlight the necessity for structured decision-making frameworks to reduce biases and improve entrepreneurs' roles in promoting sustainable economic growth (SDG 8). Research Implications: This study highlights the importance of systematic decision-making and evaluating investor feedback to reduce biases. It provides practical recommendations for equity crowdfunding platforms, policymakers, and entrepreneurs to improve financial decision-making and economic resilience, aligning with the SDGs. Originality/Value: This study examines cognitive biases in ECF decision-making through a behavioral finance perspective. It supports SDG 8 by promoting informed financial decisions and fostering startup success and sustainable economic growth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n04.pe05713
Citations
2
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Biases and Entrepreneurial Decision-Making in Equity Crowdfunding: Implications for Economic Growth and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 8)

Kwek Choon Ling, Lei Cheng, Li Y
2 citations
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
article

Cognitive Biases and Entrepreneurial Decision-Making in Equity Crowdfunding: Implications for Economic Growth and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 8)

Kwek Choon Ling, Lei Cheng, Li Y
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the influence of cognitive biases on startup entrepreneurs' decision-making processes in equity crowdfunding (ECF), a rapidly growing funding mechanism. It explores how cognitive biases manifest among startup entrepreneurs during ECF campaigns and analyses the implications of these biases for funding decisions and long-term startup sustainability and contributions to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth). Theoretical Framework: Grounded in frameworks of Bounded Rationality, Prospect Theory, and Entrepreneurial Cognition, it examines the impact of six key biases: overconfidence, optimism, planning fallacy, anchoring, availability, and representativeness, on strategic decisions during ECF campaigns. Method: Utilising semi-structured interviews with 10 startup entrepreneurs across various industries, thematic analysis was employed to identify heuristic-driven behaviours and their implications. Results and Discussion: The study identifies six cognitive biases affecting ECF decisions. Overconfidence and optimism inflate targets and hinder adaptability while planning fallacy and anchoring cause misaligned strategies. Availability and representativeness biases lead to misapplied approaches, impacting campaign success and startup sustainability. These findings highlight the necessity for structured decision-making frameworks to reduce biases and improve entrepreneurs' roles in promoting sustainable economic growth (SDG 8). Research Implications: This study highlights the importance of systematic decision-making and evaluating investor feedback to reduce biases. It provides practical recommendations for equity crowdfunding platforms, policymakers, and entrepreneurs to improve financial decision-making and economic resilience, aligning with the SDGs. Originality/Value: This study examines cognitive biases in ECF decision-making through a behavioral finance perspective. It supports SDG 8 by promoting informed financial decisions and fostering startup success and sustainable economic growth.

Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs ReviewVol. 5(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
4.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.