Silencing and Legitimizing Dominant Ideologies in Literacy

In this qualitative study, we engage in a critical discourse analysis of the counternarratives of a Black female preservice teacher (Paula) to understand how she experienced planning and teaching a literacy lesson, using a picture book about a Black girl's experience of racism, in her white mentor teacher's classroom. Drawing upon counternarratives and theories of curriculum and dominant ideologies, we explore how racetalk was silenced and dominant ideologies were legitimized. We also discuss how Paula learned from and resisted lessons in silencing racetalk from her mentor teacher. Lastly, we explore intersections of race, gender, and agency in student teaching. We conclude with implications that include exploring how race, gender, and power dynamics influence literacy in internship classrooms; accounting for students' intersectional identities in theories of teacher development; dispelling myths about racetalk; informing mentor teachers about the competencies that student teachers bring; and recognizing racial literacies as an asset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literacy Research
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296x251320662
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silencing and Legitimizing Dominant Ideologies in Literacy

Melissa L. Wilson, Faythe Beauchemin, H. Hamner Hill
Journal of Literacy Research
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Silencing and Legitimizing Dominant Ideologies in Literacy

Melissa L. Wilson, Faythe Beauchemin, H. Hamner Hill
article en

Abstract

In this qualitative study, we engage in a critical discourse analysis of the counternarratives of a Black female preservice teacher (Paula) to understand how she experienced planning and teaching a literacy lesson, using a picture book about a Black girl's experience of racism, in her white mentor teacher's classroom. Drawing upon counternarratives and theories of curriculum and dominant ideologies, we explore how racetalk was silenced and dominant ideologies were legitimized. We also discuss how Paula learned from and resisted lessons in silencing racetalk from her mentor teacher. Lastly, we explore intersections of race, gender, and agency in student teaching. We conclude with implications that include exploring how race, gender, and power dynamics influence literacy in internship classrooms; accounting for students' intersectional identities in theories of teacher development; dispelling myths about racetalk; informing mentor teachers about the competencies that student teachers bring; and recognizing racial literacies as an asset.

Journal of Literacy ResearchVol. 57(1)
Cleveland State University (US), Boston College (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Silencing and Legitimizing Dominant Ideologies in Literacy — Melissa L. Wilson, Faythe Beauchemin, et al. · Journal of Literacy Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS