Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science

The state of the science of nutrition and its relationship to brain health is complex, making dissemination of research findings difficult. One contributing factor is the lack of a consensus on defining brain health. Some organizations emphasize cognitive function (eg, memory, perception, judgment, decline, impairment) and/or the presence of dementia, whereas others use a broader conceptualization to include mood and stress. Regarding nutrition, some studies support specific dietary patterns, such as the MIND (Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet, for preserving cognitive function. Others find no effect. Public-facing organizations communicate this science in varying ways to meet consumer and patient needs and interest in preserving brain function as they age. Some organizations have standardized communication methods, whereas others communicate based on topics most salient to the consumer or patient, regardless of the strength of the evidence. This conceptual article reflects a roundtable discussion among stakeholders to document processes for communicating the state of the science to inform best practices moving forward. Six best practices are offered to ensure consistent, evidence-based communication, which is vital in the digital age where misinformation is pervasive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Today
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nt.0000000000000744
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science

Lauren Roberson, Alison Steiber, Deirdre Le Faye, Lindsay R. Chura et al.
Nutrition Today
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Best Practices for Communicating Nutrition and Brain Health Science

Lauren Roberson, Alison Steiber, Deirdre Le Faye, Lindsay R. Chura, Marie E. Latulippe, Guylaine Ferland, Emily Ho, Sarah D. Ohlhorst, Kristien Aarts, Timothy Coetzee
article en

Abstract

The state of the science of nutrition and its relationship to brain health is complex, making dissemination of research findings difficult. One contributing factor is the lack of a consensus on defining brain health. Some organizations emphasize cognitive function (eg, memory, perception, judgment, decline, impairment) and/or the presence of dementia, whereas others use a broader conceptualization to include mood and stress. Regarding nutrition, some studies support specific dietary patterns, such as the MIND (Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet, for preserving cognitive function. Others find no effect. Public-facing organizations communicate this science in varying ways to meet consumer and patient needs and interest in preserving brain function as they age. Some organizations have standardized communication methods, whereas others communicate based on topics most salient to the consumer or patient, regardless of the strength of the evidence. This conceptual article reflects a roundtable discussion among stakeholders to document processes for communicating the state of the science to inform best practices moving forward. Six best practices are offered to ensure consistent, evidence-based communication, which is vital in the digital age where misinformation is pervasive.

Nutrition TodayVol. 60(2)
Northwestern University (US), American Association For The Advancement of Science (US), National Multiple Sclerosis Society (US), American Society for Nutrition (US), European Council (BE), Montreal Heart Institute (CA), European Research Council (BE), Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US), European Council for Construction Research, Development and Innovation (BE), Global Health Council (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Alzheimer's Association, Institute for the Advancement of Food and Nutrition Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.