Linear regression reporting practices for health researchers, a cross-sectional meta-research study

Our results indicate that statistical methods and results were often poorly reported without sufficient detail to reproduce them. To improve statistical quality and direct health funding to effective treatments, we recommend that statisticians be involved in the research cycle, from study design to post-peer review. The research environment is an ecosystem, and future interventions addressing poor statistical quality should consider the interactions between the individuals, organisations and policy environments. Practical recommendations include journals producing templates with standardised reporting and using interactive checklists to improve reporting practices. Investments in research maintenance and quality control are required to assess and implement these recommendations to improve the quality of health research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305150
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear regression reporting practices for health researchers, a cross-sectional meta-research study

Dimitrios Vagenas, Adrian Gerard Barnett, Lee Jones
6 citations
PLoS ONE
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
6.99
article

Linear regression reporting practices for health researchers, a cross-sectional meta-research study

Dimitrios Vagenas, Adrian Gerard Barnett, Lee Jones
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Our results indicate that statistical methods and results were often poorly reported without sufficient detail to reproduce them. To improve statistical quality and direct health funding to effective treatments, we recommend that statisticians be involved in the research cycle, from study design to post-peer review. The research environment is an ecosystem, and future interventions addressing poor statistical quality should consider the interactions between the individuals, organisations and policy environments. Practical recommendations include journals producing templates with standardised reporting and using interactive checklists to improve reporting practices. Investments in research maintenance and quality control are required to assess and implement these recommendations to improve the quality of health research.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(3)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
Statistical Society of Australia
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
6.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linear regression reporting practices for health researchers, a cross-sectional meta-research study — Dimitrios Vagenas, Adrian Gerard Barnett, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS