Conflicts and Reconciliations of Vsevolod the Big Nest and His Sons with Chernigov Princes (1170s–1230s)

The article is devoted to one aspect of the history of Old Rus’ relating to the epoch of political fragmentation. At this time, there were permanent conflicts and clashes between the rulers of the principalities and between the political entities of Old Rus’ – the principalities and the Novgorod Republic. Therefore, the study of political history of fragmented Rus’ through conflicts is promising. It was the conflicts that actualised inter-princely diplomacy (the task of its study was formulated by V.T. Pashuto). Conflicts and reconciliations of the princes of Chernigov and Vladimir principalities in the 1170s–1230s are the subject of this paper. The chronological framework is conditioned by the reigns of Vsevolod the Big Nest and his sons. With the reign of Vsevolod the Big Nest there started the establishment of the dynasty that later gave Moscow princes and tsars. In the article reconstructions of Chernigov–Vladimir conflicts of 1180–1181, 1186, 1194, 1195–1196, 1206–1210, 1224–1225, and 1229–1230 are presented. These conflicts were of varying intensity. Sharp and decisive actions of Vladimir princes, Vsevolod the Big Nest and his son Yaroslav, made those conflicts more acute. These actions included neglect of previous services, seizure of hostages, and deception of trust. Such behavior of Vladimir princes in conflict situations was determined by their personalities, firstly by that of Vsevolod the Big Nest. The subjects of disputes between Chernigov and Vladimir princedoms in different conflicts were the control and influence in Ryazan princedom, in Pereyaslavl princedom in the south of Rus’, in Novgorod. The stability of the conflict line in relations between Vladimir and Chernigov principalities made their relations an important and significant factor in the history of the fragmented Rus’ in 1170s–1230s. This is confirmed by the systematic participation of Russian metropolitans in the resolution of Chernigov-Vladimir disputes. As a rule, Vladimir princes emerged victorious from the conflicts due to their uncompromising attitude and disregard for the norms of the established princely etiquette. Reconciliation was facilitated by the presence of a common opponent, Smolensk princes. The result of the 50-year period of conflicts and reconciliations was the displacement of Chernigov princes from Northern Rus’ by Vladimir princes, as well as the decrease in the political importance and weight of Chernigov princes on the eve and during the Mongol invasion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32608/1560-1382-2025-46-140-158
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflicts and Reconciliations of Vsevolod the Big Nest and His Sons with Chernigov Princes (1170s–1230s)

Andrey A. Kuznetsov
Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Conflicts and Reconciliations of Vsevolod the Big Nest and His Sons with Chernigov Princes (1170s–1230s)

Andrey A. Kuznetsov
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to one aspect of the history of Old Rus’ relating to the epoch of political fragmentation. At this time, there were permanent conflicts and clashes between the rulers of the principalities and between the political entities of Old Rus’ – the principalities and the Novgorod Republic. Therefore, the study of political history of fragmented Rus’ through conflicts is promising. It was the conflicts that actualised inter-princely diplomacy (the task of its study was formulated by V.T. Pashuto). Conflicts and reconciliations of the princes of Chernigov and Vladimir principalities in the 1170s–1230s are the subject of this paper. The chronological framework is conditioned by the reigns of Vsevolod the Big Nest and his sons. With the reign of Vsevolod the Big Nest there started the establishment of the dynasty that later gave Moscow princes and tsars. In the article reconstructions of Chernigov–Vladimir conflicts of 1180–1181, 1186, 1194, 1195–1196, 1206–1210, 1224–1225, and 1229–1230 are presented. These conflicts were of varying intensity. Sharp and decisive actions of Vladimir princes, Vsevolod the Big Nest and his son Yaroslav, made those conflicts more acute. These actions included neglect of previous services, seizure of hostages, and deception of trust. Such behavior of Vladimir princes in conflict situations was determined by their personalities, firstly by that of Vsevolod the Big Nest. The subjects of disputes between Chernigov and Vladimir princedoms in different conflicts were the control and influence in Ryazan princedom, in Pereyaslavl princedom in the south of Rus’, in Novgorod. The stability of the conflict line in relations between Vladimir and Chernigov principalities made their relations an important and significant factor in the history of the fragmented Rus’ in 1170s–1230s. This is confirmed by the systematic participation of Russian metropolitans in the resolution of Chernigov-Vladimir disputes. As a rule, Vladimir princes emerged victorious from the conflicts due to their uncompromising attitude and disregard for the norms of the established princely etiquette. Reconciliation was facilitated by the presence of a common opponent, Smolensk princes. The result of the 50-year period of conflicts and reconciliations was the displacement of Chernigov princes from Northern Rus’ by Vladimir princes, as well as the decrease in the political importance and weight of Chernigov princes on the eve and during the Mongol invasion.

Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi EvropyVol. 2025(46)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.