Mediators in the Politics of Medieval Rus’

The article examines the status and functions of peace mediators in conflicts of the pre‑Mongol Rus’ based on materials of three chronicles: the Primary Chronicle, the Kievan Chronicle (according to the Hypatian and similar manuscripts) and the First Novgorodian Chronicle. Among mediators of this period, two main groups can be distinguished: (1) the closest younger relatives of one of the competitors; these juniors could be both the initiators of a truce agreement and intermediate persons whom a defeated enemy applied to; and (2) peacemakers, who, on the contrary, were maximally distanced from the conflict and who had no personal interest in it, but had a very high status of a ruler or similar. Often, such a mediator could be a foreign ruler, usually of a neighboring land. The political practices used to end conflicts in medieval Rus’ demonstrate a wide range of people involved, including young princes, widowed princesses, clergy: metropolitans, bishops and abbots of famous monasteries. The negotiation process itself could take place in several stages with more than one element in the peacekeeping chain.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32608/1560-1382-2025-46-125-139
Primary Topic
Historical and Archaeological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mediators in the Politics of Medieval Rus’

Maria Lavrenchenko
Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy
Historical and Archaeological Studies
article

Mediators in the Politics of Medieval Rus’

Maria Lavrenchenko
article en

Abstract

The article examines the status and functions of peace mediators in conflicts of the pre‑Mongol Rus’ based on materials of three chronicles: the Primary Chronicle, the Kievan Chronicle (according to the Hypatian and similar manuscripts) and the First Novgorodian Chronicle. Among mediators of this period, two main groups can be distinguished: (1) the closest younger relatives of one of the competitors; these juniors could be both the initiators of a truce agreement and intermediate persons whom a defeated enemy applied to; and (2) peacemakers, who, on the contrary, were maximally distanced from the conflict and who had no personal interest in it, but had a very high status of a ruler or similar. Often, such a mediator could be a foreign ruler, usually of a neighboring land. The political practices used to end conflicts in medieval Rus’ demonstrate a wide range of people involved, including young princes, widowed princesses, clergy: metropolitans, bishops and abbots of famous monasteries. The negotiation process itself could take place in several stages with more than one element in the peacekeeping chain.

Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi EvropyVol. 2025(46)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Historical and Archaeological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mediators in the Politics of Medieval Rus’ — Maria Lavrenchenko · Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS