Comparison of the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Psychological Symptoms and Resilience in Individuals Seeking Divorce

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of group schema therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on psychological symptoms and resilience in individuals seeking divorce. The research method was a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test, and a control group, along with a three-month follow-up period. The statistical population included individuals seeking divorce who referred to Family Court Complex No. 2 in Velenjak, Tehran, between December 2023 and March 2024, totaling 501 individuals. A sample of 60 eligible participants was selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria using convenience sampling and was randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group (each group consisting of 20 individuals). The data collection instruments included the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) (Connor & Davidson, 2003). All three groups underwent a pre-test using the research instruments. Then, group schema therapy and MBSR interventions were separately administered to their respective experimental groups over eight 90-minute sessions, while the control group was placed on a waitlist. Upon completion of the interventions, a post-test was conducted for both experimental and control groups, followed by a follow-up test three months later. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The findings indicated that both group schema therapy and MBSR significantly impacted psychological symptoms and resilience in individuals seeking divorce (p < .05). The results of the Scheffé test demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the two interventions on psychological symptoms (p < .05; MD = 2.50), with MBSR being more effective than group schema therapy in reducing psychological symptoms. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two interventions regarding resilience enhancement (p > .05; MD = 2.97), suggesting that both therapies equally contributed to increasing resilience. The effects remained stable at the three-month follow-up. This study suggests that group schema therapy and MBSR can significantly help reduce psychological disorders such as stress, anxiety, and depression while enhancing resilience in individuals undergoing divorce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.fct.psynexus.3.4
Primary Topic
Child Therapy and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Psychological Symptoms and Resilience in Individuals Seeking Divorce

Mohammadreza Zarbakhsh Bahri, Bahareh Hasanpour Asil, Taherehi HamzehPoor Haghigh
KMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus
Child Therapy and Development
article

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Group Schema Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Psychological Symptoms and Resilience in Individuals Seeking Divorce

Mohammadreza Zarbakhsh Bahri, Bahareh Hasanpour Asil, Taherehi HamzehPoor Haghigh
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of group schema therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on psychological symptoms and resilience in individuals seeking divorce. The research method was a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test, post-test, and a control group, along with a three-month follow-up period. The statistical population included individuals seeking divorce who referred to Family Court Complex No. 2 in Velenjak, Tehran, between December 2023 and March 2024, totaling 501 individuals. A sample of 60 eligible participants was selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria using convenience sampling and was randomly assigned to two experimental groups and one control group (each group consisting of 20 individuals). The data collection instruments included the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995) and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) (Connor & Davidson, 2003). All three groups underwent a pre-test using the research instruments. Then, group schema therapy and MBSR interventions were separately administered to their respective experimental groups over eight 90-minute sessions, while the control group was placed on a waitlist. Upon completion of the interventions, a post-test was conducted for both experimental and control groups, followed by a follow-up test three months later. The data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The findings indicated that both group schema therapy and MBSR significantly impacted psychological symptoms and resilience in individuals seeking divorce (p < .05). The results of the Scheffé test demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the two interventions on psychological symptoms (p < .05; MD = 2.50), with MBSR being more effective than group schema therapy in reducing psychological symptoms. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two interventions regarding resilience enhancement (p > .05; MD = 2.97), suggesting that both therapies equally contributed to increasing resilience. The effects remained stable at the three-month follow-up. This study suggests that group schema therapy and MBSR can significantly help reduce psychological disorders such as stress, anxiety, and depression while enhancing resilience in individuals undergoing divorce.

KMAN Counseling and Psychology NexusVol. 3
Islamic Azad University Tonekabon (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Child Therapy and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.