Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing

Dental implants rely on precise prosthetic design and biomechanical stability to ensure long-term success. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of non-engaging abutments in multi-unit combined screw- and cement-retained prostheses (CSCRP) using two internal implant systems: the BlueDiamond (BD) and AnyOne (AO) systems. Unlike conventional implant systems that utilize the same type of screw for both engaging and non-engaging abutments, the BD system employs a distinct screw design for non-engaging abutments. A total of 80 implants were tested, with 40 in each group. Mechanical testing included static compressive load and fatigue tests following ISO 14801 standards. The BD system demonstrated significantly higher compressive strength (326.32 kgf vs. 231.82 kgf, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 23.4% greater fatigue strength compared to the AO system. Precision fit analysis confirmed no significant deformation, microcracks, or fractures after 5 million loading cycles. These findings suggest that the BD system's unique screw design for non-engaging abutments contributes to improved mechanical performance and durability. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the long-term implications of this design on prosthetic stability and implant longevity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16030107
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing

Sang-Min Yi, In Young Park, Soo‐Hwan Byun, Byoung‐Eun Yang et al.
4 citations
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
article

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Non-Engaging Abutment and Screw in Internal Implant Systems: Comparative Fatigue and Load Testing

Sang-Min Yi, In Young Park, Soo‐Hwan Byun, Byoung‐Eun Yang, Lee-Kyoung Kim, Sung‐Hoon Ahn, Sung-Woon On, Su-Min Cho, Sang‐Yoon Park, Hyun-Sook Han
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Dental implants rely on precise prosthetic design and biomechanical stability to ensure long-term success. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of non-engaging abutments in multi-unit combined screw- and cement-retained prostheses (CSCRP) using two internal implant systems: the BlueDiamond (BD) and AnyOne (AO) systems. Unlike conventional implant systems that utilize the same type of screw for both engaging and non-engaging abutments, the BD system employs a distinct screw design for non-engaging abutments. A total of 80 implants were tested, with 40 in each group. Mechanical testing included static compressive load and fatigue tests following ISO 14801 standards. The BD system demonstrated significantly higher compressive strength (326.32 kgf vs. 231.82 kgf, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 23.4% greater fatigue strength compared to the AO system. Precision fit analysis confirmed no significant deformation, microcracks, or fractures after 5 million loading cycles. These findings suggest that the BD system's unique screw design for non-engaging abutments contributes to improved mechanical performance and durability. Further clinical studies are needed to assess the long-term implications of this design on prosthetic stability and implant longevity.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 16(3)
Hallym University (KR), Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), Hallym University Medical Center (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.