Don’t Worry Darling: Critiquing the nostalgic cultural logic of late patriarchy

Don’t Worry Darling features a group of men from the 2020s who retreat into a computer simulation of 1950s suburbia in which they can exert full patriarchal control over their chosen wives. Meanwhile, the real-world models on which these fantasy wives are based are forced to give up their own lives in the 2020s in order to support the simulation (via some unspecified and rather unlikely process). The film doesn’t always make sense, but it is obviously meant to be read allegorically, rather than literally – as a commentary on the persistence of patriarchal ideas in our own time. Some critics felt that the film’s feminist commentary was a bit simplistic and heavy-handed. However, read through the optic of Fredric Jameson’s seminal theorization of postmodernism, Don’t Worry Darling can be seen to call attention to the ways in which fears of the loss of patriarchal power can be used to divert attention from the damaging psychic consequences of late capitalism. The persistence of patriarchy after decades of feminist activism can thus be partly explained by the fact that this persistence is useful to the capitalist power structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of American Culture
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/ejac_00132_1
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don’t Worry Darling: Critiquing the nostalgic cultural logic of late patriarchy

Isra Daraiseh, M. Keith Booker
European Journal of American Culture
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Don’t Worry Darling: Critiquing the nostalgic cultural logic of late patriarchy

Isra Daraiseh, M. Keith Booker
article en

Abstract

Don’t Worry Darling features a group of men from the 2020s who retreat into a computer simulation of 1950s suburbia in which they can exert full patriarchal control over their chosen wives. Meanwhile, the real-world models on which these fantasy wives are based are forced to give up their own lives in the 2020s in order to support the simulation (via some unspecified and rather unlikely process). The film doesn’t always make sense, but it is obviously meant to be read allegorically, rather than literally – as a commentary on the persistence of patriarchal ideas in our own time. Some critics felt that the film’s feminist commentary was a bit simplistic and heavy-handed. However, read through the optic of Fredric Jameson’s seminal theorization of postmodernism, Don’t Worry Darling can be seen to call attention to the ways in which fears of the loss of patriarchal power can be used to divert attention from the damaging psychic consequences of late capitalism. The persistence of patriarchy after decades of feminist activism can thus be partly explained by the fact that this persistence is useful to the capitalist power structure.

European Journal of American CultureVol. 44(1)
Arab Open University (KW), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Don’t Worry Darling: Critiquing the nostalgic cultural logic of late patriarchy — Isra Daraiseh, M. Keith Booker · European Journal of American Culture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS