Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts.

Background: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and every attempt should be made to develop screening programs to detect it at its early stages in order to improve survival rate. Using the ADNEX model in screening for ovarian cancer will help in triaging patients with adnexal masses before undergoing surgery which will help in optimizing outcomes particularly for those with ovarian malignancy.Patients & methods: This was a prospective study which included fifty postmenopausal patients with adnexal mass. All the included patients underwent ultrasound assessment of the adnexal mass and measurement of CA 125 level. Then, the data were collected to calculate the RMI, and integrated to IOTA ADNEX calculator. The primary outcome was determining the predictive accuracy of both RMI and ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors by setting both against the gold standard histopathology.Results: Out of the included 50 patients, 56% had benign ovarian lesions, 12% had borderline ovarian tumors, and 24% had malignant ovarian tumors. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the RMI was 0.799 and with cutoff value of 115, the sensitivity was 81.8%, the specificity was 60.7% while the AUC was 0.864 for the ADNEX model and at 10% cutoff, the sensitivity was 91.1% and the specificity was 65%. Performance of the ADNEX for the five tumor types was highest when benign histopathology was compared as stage □ - □ malignant cases with AUC of 0.823. Conclusion: ADNEX model is more sensitive than RMI for differentiating between benign and malignant tumors and it can be used as screening test. However, the application of ADNEX model needs significant experience in ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses before it can be an integral part in the screening pathway of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal patients with adnexal masses.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05755841 – Data of registration: 3/30/2024 “retrospectively registered”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Fertility of Sterility
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/egyfs.2025.417771
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts.

Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy, Kareem Labib, Hassan Morsi, Amr Hassan El-Shalakany et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Fertility of Sterility
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts.

Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy, Kareem Labib, Hassan Morsi, Amr Hassan El-Shalakany, Asmaa Mohamed Mohamed Dwedar, Mortada E. Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and every attempt should be made to develop screening programs to detect it at its early stages in order to improve survival rate. Using the ADNEX model in screening for ovarian cancer will help in triaging patients with adnexal masses before undergoing surgery which will help in optimizing outcomes particularly for those with ovarian malignancy.Patients & methods: This was a prospective study which included fifty postmenopausal patients with adnexal mass. All the included patients underwent ultrasound assessment of the adnexal mass and measurement of CA 125 level. Then, the data were collected to calculate the RMI, and integrated to IOTA ADNEX calculator. The primary outcome was determining the predictive accuracy of both RMI and ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors by setting both against the gold standard histopathology.Results: Out of the included 50 patients, 56% had benign ovarian lesions, 12% had borderline ovarian tumors, and 24% had malignant ovarian tumors. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the RMI was 0.799 and with cutoff value of 115, the sensitivity was 81.8%, the specificity was 60.7% while the AUC was 0.864 for the ADNEX model and at 10% cutoff, the sensitivity was 91.1% and the specificity was 65%. Performance of the ADNEX for the five tumor types was highest when benign histopathology was compared as stage □ - □ malignant cases with AUC of 0.823. Conclusion: ADNEX model is more sensitive than RMI for differentiating between benign and malignant tumors and it can be used as screening test. However, the application of ADNEX model needs significant experience in ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses before it can be an integral part in the screening pathway of ovarian malignancy in postmenopausal patients with adnexal masses.Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05755841 – Data of registration: 3/30/2024 “retrospectively registered”.

The Egyptian Journal of Fertility of SterilityVol. 29(2)
Ain Shams University (EG), Fordham University (US), Ministry of Health and Population (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.