Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Enhancing Men’s Awareness of Testicular diseases (E-MAT) Feasibility Trial: A Virtual Reality Experience to Increase Testicular Knowledge and Self-Examination among Male Athletes

Economic evaluations alongside feasibility trials enable early economic evaluations, informing the design and conduct of a future RCT. E-MAT<sub>VR</sub> had higher expected benefits (WTP) and costs than E-MAT<sub>E</sub>, yielding a negative net benefit. Given the high cost of digital health interventions, investigating their cost-effectiveness early is important to inform and optimize resource allocation decisions. We present a series of scenarios to demonstrate how delivery modifications to reduce costs could improve the likelihood of E-MAT<sub>VR</sub> being considered cost-effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PharmacoEconomics - Open
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00571-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Enhancing Men’s Awareness of Testicular diseases (E-MAT) Feasibility Trial: A Virtual Reality Experience to Increase Testicular Knowledge and Self-Examination among Male Athletes

David Murphy, Billy O’Mahony, Frances Shiely, Martin P. Davoren et al.
1 citations
PharmacoEconomics - Open
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
article

Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Enhancing Men’s Awareness of Testicular diseases (E-MAT) Feasibility Trial: A Virtual Reality Experience to Increase Testicular Knowledge and Self-Examination among Male Athletes

David Murphy, Billy O’Mahony, Frances Shiely, Martin P. Davoren, Josephine Hegarty, Gillian W. Shorter, Janas M. Harrington, Federica De Blasio, Ann Kirby, Mohamad M. Saab, Michael J. Rovito, Steve Robertson, Mary K Riordan, Eoghan Cooke, Megan McCarthy, Aileen Murphy, Serena FitzGerald, A. Connor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Economic evaluations alongside feasibility trials enable early economic evaluations, informing the design and conduct of a future RCT. E-MAT<sub>VR</sub> had higher expected benefits (WTP) and costs than E-MAT<sub>E</sub>, yielding a negative net benefit. Given the high cost of digital health interventions, investigating their cost-effectiveness early is important to inform and optimize resource allocation decisions. We present a series of scenarios to demonstrate how delivery modifications to reduce costs could improve the likelihood of E-MAT<sub>VR</sub> being considered cost-effective.

PharmacoEconomics - OpenVol. 9(4)
University of Central Florida (US), Queen's University Belfast (GB), University College Cork (IE), Gaelic Athletic Association (IE), University of Sheffield (GB)
Health Research Board
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.