Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands (Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey) were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand (n=5) from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software (Geomagic, USA). Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukey’s HSD, and Tamhane's T2 tests, with significance set at P

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meandros Medical And Dental Journal
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1590982
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Mustafa Zortuk, Taha Yaşar Manav, Sergen Deniz
Meandros Medical And Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Impact of reuse of dental implant analogs on impression accuracy

Mustafa Zortuk, Taha Yaşar Manav, Sergen Deniz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to examine the impact of repeated use of different implant impression analogs on the accuracy of the resulting impressions. Materials and Methods: Implant bodies from three brands (Group SA: Straumann, Switzerland; Group DA: Dio Implant, South Korea; Group MA: Mode Implant, Turkey) were used to create master models. Five reference casts were then fabricated for each brand (n=5) from these master models. Ten impressions were taken from each reference cast using the same analogs, which were sterilized between each impression. Both reference and working casts were digitized with a three-dimensional scanner. The working casts were aligned with their respective reference casts using software (Geomagic, USA). Repeated-measures ANOVA compared groups, while one-way ANOVA compared impressions within each group. Multiple comparisons utilized Bonferroni, Tukey’s HSD, and Tamhane's T2 tests, with significance set at P

Meandros Medical And Dental JournalVol. 26(1)
Mustafa Kemal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.