Understanding Limitations of Nonlinear Damping Ratio Identification Methods from Force Appropriation Tests.

Energy dissipation (i.e., damping) is a critical quantity to identify in order to understand the dynamic performance of a mechanical design as the dissipation directly influences response amplification near resonance. In linear systems, dissipation is often modeled with constant viscous damping for each mode and can be extracted directly from modal tests in the form of damping ratio. For nonlinear systems there have been many proposed techniques for characterizing damping from experimental measurements, however researchers have yet to reach a consensus on a unified approach. This work investigates three damping identification methods and evaluates each of their limitations. The context for the identification is the nonlinear force appropriation testing technique. The study conducts virtual experiments utilizing multi-harmonic balance solutions where phase resonance is enforced on single-degree-of-freedom models with different nonlinearities – both conservative and non-conservative. In this way, the calculated damping ratios are compared directly to corresponding analytical approximations from the models to enable a critical assessment of their accuracy and of any limitations of each damping identification technique. Additionally, the effect of higher harmonics (both in phase resonance and uncontrolled) on the damping ratio estimates is explored by including an electro-mechanical model of a shaker. In addition to identifying limitations for each damping identification technique considered, this work shows that the trend in the damping ratio does not necessarily reflect the true nature of the nonlinear damping restoring force. Moreover, the damping ratio trend identified from nonlinear force appropriation experiments is sensitive to higher harmonics in the excitation force regardless of whether they are maintained in phase resonance or uncontrolled.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Dynamics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25518/2684-6500.245
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Limitations of Nonlinear Damping Ratio Identification Methods from Force Appropriation Tests.

Robert J. Kuether, Benjamin Pacini, Deborah Fowler
1 links
Journal of Structural Dynamics
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

Understanding Limitations of Nonlinear Damping Ratio Identification Methods from Force Appropriation Tests.

Robert J. Kuether, Benjamin Pacini, Deborah Fowler
article en

Abstract

Energy dissipation (i.e., damping) is a critical quantity to identify in order to understand the dynamic performance of a mechanical design as the dissipation directly influences response amplification near resonance. In linear systems, dissipation is often modeled with constant viscous damping for each mode and can be extracted directly from modal tests in the form of damping ratio. For nonlinear systems there have been many proposed techniques for characterizing damping from experimental measurements, however researchers have yet to reach a consensus on a unified approach. This work investigates three damping identification methods and evaluates each of their limitations. The context for the identification is the nonlinear force appropriation testing technique. The study conducts virtual experiments utilizing multi-harmonic balance solutions where phase resonance is enforced on single-degree-of-freedom models with different nonlinearities – both conservative and non-conservative. In this way, the calculated damping ratios are compared directly to corresponding analytical approximations from the models to enable a critical assessment of their accuracy and of any limitations of each damping identification technique. Additionally, the effect of higher harmonics (both in phase resonance and uncontrolled) on the damping ratio estimates is explored by including an electro-mechanical model of a shaker. In addition to identifying limitations for each damping identification technique considered, this work shows that the trend in the damping ratio does not necessarily reflect the true nature of the nonlinear damping restoring force. Moreover, the damping ratio trend identified from nonlinear force appropriation experiments is sensitive to higher harmonics in the excitation force regardless of whether they are maintained in phase resonance or uncontrolled.

Journal of Structural Dynamics
Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Sandia National Laboratories
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.