The Importance of Comorbidities at Baseline and 5-Year Follow-Up in a Lung Cancer Biomarker Screening Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite recent lung cancer screening (LCS) studies proving significant mortality reduction, comorbidities are a prominent issue affecting cost effectiveness, which is holding back national implementation. Incidental findings (IFs) of comorbidities make a significant contribution to delayed diagnoses and raise discussions about optimal management plans. This is particularly relevant to national lung cancer screening (NLCS), as the high-risk population qualifying for the screening often have increased likelihood for comorbidities due to their smoking history. <b>Methods</b>: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01925625) study showcases a targeted approach to NLCS by implementing the blood-based biomarker EarlyCDT-Lung test. Firstly, this paper explored the ECLS dataset for comorbidities present within the screening population at baseline A chi-square analysis was then undertaken to investigate the relationship of cohort allocation and incidence of new comorbidities over the five-year follow-up period. <b>Results</b>: High prevalence conditions were cardiovascular (38.5%), neurological/psychiatric (33.9%), gastrointestinal (29.8%), and respiratory (19.2%). While 20.3% of the total patient cohort showed a newly discovered comorbidity, there was no significant variation in new incidences between the intervention and control cohort. <b>Conclusions</b>: When considering these results alongside the all-cause mortality reduction shown in previous analyses, they indicate that this targeted approach to LCS might help improve the benefit-harm ratio through the introduction of biomarkers. Further refining selection criteria for low-dose CT screening might contribute to minimising the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062116
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Comorbidities at Baseline and 5-Year Follow-Up in a Lung Cancer Biomarker Screening Trial

Frank Sullivan, Wenyan Kong, Fergus Daly, Nimue Lilith Romeikat
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

The Importance of Comorbidities at Baseline and 5-Year Follow-Up in a Lung Cancer Biomarker Screening Trial

Frank Sullivan, Wenyan Kong, Fergus Daly, Nimue Lilith Romeikat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite recent lung cancer screening (LCS) studies proving significant mortality reduction, comorbidities are a prominent issue affecting cost effectiveness, which is holding back national implementation. Incidental findings (IFs) of comorbidities make a significant contribution to delayed diagnoses and raise discussions about optimal management plans. This is particularly relevant to national lung cancer screening (NLCS), as the high-risk population qualifying for the screening often have increased likelihood for comorbidities due to their smoking history. <b>Methods</b>: The Early Detection of Cancer of the Lung Scotland (ECLS) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01925625) study showcases a targeted approach to NLCS by implementing the blood-based biomarker EarlyCDT-Lung test. Firstly, this paper explored the ECLS dataset for comorbidities present within the screening population at baseline A chi-square analysis was then undertaken to investigate the relationship of cohort allocation and incidence of new comorbidities over the five-year follow-up period. <b>Results</b>: High prevalence conditions were cardiovascular (38.5%), neurological/psychiatric (33.9%), gastrointestinal (29.8%), and respiratory (19.2%). While 20.3% of the total patient cohort showed a newly discovered comorbidity, there was no significant variation in new incidences between the intervention and control cohort. <b>Conclusions</b>: When considering these results alongside the all-cause mortality reduction shown in previous analyses, they indicate that this targeted approach to LCS might help improve the benefit-harm ratio through the introduction of biomarkers. Further refining selection criteria for low-dose CT screening might contribute to minimising the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(6)
University of St Andrews (GB)
University of St Andrews
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Importance of Comorbidities at Baseline and 5-Year Follow-Up in a Lung Cancer Biomarker Screening Trial — Frank Sullivan, Wenyan Kong, et al. · Journal of Clinical Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS