Decision-making framing in facial image comparison.

Unfamiliar face identification is a challenging task and is often considered to be perceptual in nature. This ignores the contribution of decision making in face identification. Across three experiments, we examined whether face-matching decisions would change depending on the framing of response options. In Experiment 1, participants completed an unfamiliar face-matching task with the Same/Different, Same/Not-Same, or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. In Experiment 2, participants completed the task twice, once with the Same/Different response options and once with the Same/Different, Same/Not-Same, or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. In Experiment 3, participants completed the task when 50% or 80% of trials were matches and used the Same/Different or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. Whereas we found no evidence that face-identification decisions were influenced by the framing of response options, we found evidence of a robust base rate effect. Together, these findings suggest that decision making in unfamiliar face identification is a complex and selective process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000216
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making framing in facial image comparison.

Kristen Baker, Markus Bindemann
2 citations
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Face recognition and analysis
2.55
article

Decision-making framing in facial image comparison.

Kristen Baker, Markus Bindemann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Unfamiliar face identification is a challenging task and is often considered to be perceptual in nature. This ignores the contribution of decision making in face identification. Across three experiments, we examined whether face-matching decisions would change depending on the framing of response options. In Experiment 1, participants completed an unfamiliar face-matching task with the Same/Different, Same/Not-Same, or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. In Experiment 2, participants completed the task twice, once with the Same/Different response options and once with the Same/Different, Same/Not-Same, or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. In Experiment 3, participants completed the task when 50% or 80% of trials were matches and used the Same/Different or Same/Proceed-to-Next-Trial response options. Whereas we found no evidence that face-identification decisions were influenced by the framing of response options, we found evidence of a robust base rate effect. Together, these findings suggest that decision making in unfamiliar face identification is a complex and selective process.

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Royal Society
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Face recognition and analysis
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decision-making framing in facial image comparison. — Kristen Baker, Markus Bindemann · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS