Seattle’s Climate Change Response Framework

The transportation sector is a major contributor to carbon emissions causing climate change and consequently presents a historic opportunity for climate action. This is particularly true in an urban context, where land uses and public transport, walking, and cycling networks can significantly reduce car dependence. Seattle, Washington, United States, is a member of C40 Cities climate network and published a groundbreaking Climate Change Response Framework (CCRF) for transportation in 2023. The framework provides City leadership and its residents with a concrete set of strategies to reduce emissions from personal and commercial transportation, grounded in a robust technical analysis that evaluated which strategies would be most effective. Underpinning the analysis is a lens of co-benefits across safety, equity, health, and economy. By making the case on these co-benefits of climate action, city policymakers and practitioners can secure valuable political support and spend political capital on strategies and investments that will truly have an impact. How such actions are positioned in communications to the general public is critical to ensure long-term support. Seattle’s focus on climate optimism and connecting CCRF strategies to new ways of messaging will allow leadership to build the broader coalition necessary for true equitable co-creation of climate solutions. This article provides an overview of the CCRF, a deep dive on the technical emissions and co-benefits analyses that underpins it, and recommendations on how other cities can approach the climate challenge through a lens of equity, inclusivity, and positivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2024-0018
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seattle’s Climate Change Response Framework

Anthony Hanson, Ben Rosenblatt, Radcliffe Dacanay, Michelle Abunaja et al.
1 citations
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
article

Seattle’s Climate Change Response Framework

Anthony Hanson, Ben Rosenblatt, Radcliffe Dacanay, Michelle Abunaja, Evan Costagliola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The transportation sector is a major contributor to carbon emissions causing climate change and consequently presents a historic opportunity for climate action. This is particularly true in an urban context, where land uses and public transport, walking, and cycling networks can significantly reduce car dependence. Seattle, Washington, United States, is a member of C40 Cities climate network and published a groundbreaking Climate Change Response Framework (CCRF) for transportation in 2023. The framework provides City leadership and its residents with a concrete set of strategies to reduce emissions from personal and commercial transportation, grounded in a robust technical analysis that evaluated which strategies would be most effective. Underpinning the analysis is a lens of co-benefits across safety, equity, health, and economy. By making the case on these co-benefits of climate action, city policymakers and practitioners can secure valuable political support and spend political capital on strategies and investments that will truly have an impact. How such actions are positioned in communications to the general public is critical to ensure long-term support. Seattle’s focus on climate optimism and connecting CCRF strategies to new ways of messaging will allow leadership to build the broader coalition necessary for true equitable co-creation of climate solutions. This article provides an overview of the CCRF, a deep dive on the technical emissions and co-benefits analyses that underpins it, and recommendations on how other cities can approach the climate challenge through a lens of equity, inclusivity, and positivity.

Journal of city climate policy and economyVol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.