Digital Mirror Therapy and Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

<b>Objective:</b> This study is aimed at testing the immediate and retained treatment efficacies of digital mirror therapy (DMT) and digital action observation therapy (DAOT) on clinical outcomes in chronic stroke patients, in comparison with dose-matched, active control rehabilitation (CR). <b>Methods:</b> Nineteen patients were randomly assigned to the DMT, DAOT, or CR for 3 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Motor Activity Log (MAL), and visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L, were conducted at preintervention (T0), postintervention (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences among the three groups on the outcomes at different time points. However, in the DMT group, scores were significantly higher on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI at T2 than at T0; in the DAOT group, those on the FMA-UE and the quality of movement subscale of the MAL were significantly higher at T2 than at T0. In the CR group, scores on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI were significantly higher at T1 than at T0. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both DMT and DAOT had retained treatment effects on motor function. DMT and DAOT might be feasible as alternative intervention strategies for chronic stroke patients. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04441190.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Occupational Therapy International
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/8741362
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Mirror Therapy and Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Kaiyu Wu, Meng-Ta Lee, Yu‐Wei Hsieh, Chih-Chi Chen et al.
Occupational Therapy International
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Digital Mirror Therapy and Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Kaiyu Wu, Meng-Ta Lee, Yu‐Wei Hsieh, Chih-Chi Chen, Ya-Ching Hsu
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> This study is aimed at testing the immediate and retained treatment efficacies of digital mirror therapy (DMT) and digital action observation therapy (DAOT) on clinical outcomes in chronic stroke patients, in comparison with dose-matched, active control rehabilitation (CR). <b>Methods:</b> Nineteen patients were randomly assigned to the DMT, DAOT, or CR for 3 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, Motor Activity Log (MAL), and visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D-5L, were conducted at preintervention (T0), postintervention (T1), and 1-month follow-up (T2). <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences among the three groups on the outcomes at different time points. However, in the DMT group, scores were significantly higher on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI at T2 than at T0; in the DAOT group, those on the FMA-UE and the quality of movement subscale of the MAL were significantly higher at T2 than at T0. In the CR group, scores on the FMA-UE and the CAHAI were significantly higher at T1 than at T0. <b>Conclusions:</b> Both DMT and DAOT had retained treatment effects on motor function. DMT and DAOT might be feasible as alternative intervention strategies for chronic stroke patients. <b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04441190.

Occupational Therapy InternationalVol. 2025(1)
Chang Gung University (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, National Science and Technology Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.