The Effects of Halfway Houses on Criminal Recidivism: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Halfway houses operate as a form of community supervision, offering a unique opportunity for individuals who have offended to receive housing, support, and other resources to aid in navigating the challenges of re-entry from closed custody. Despite being controversial in the eyes of the public, they have long been viewed by stakeholders as a worthwhile intervention. However, existing literature presents mixed findings on their utility. The current study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies providing 17 effect sizes on the effects of halfway houses on recidivism. Findings indicate that halfway houses do not result in any differences for treatment versus comparison group participants with respect to outcomes of arrest (<i>k</i> = 6), conviction (<i>k</i> = 5), or incarceration (<i>k</i> = 6). Additional research is needed to inform best practices for structure and services, and how best to respond to differing participant needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x251327574
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Halfway Houses on Criminal Recidivism: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jennifer S. Wong, Chelsey Lee, Kelsey Gushue, Kia Neilsen
1 citations
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
article

The Effects of Halfway Houses on Criminal Recidivism: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jennifer S. Wong, Chelsey Lee, Kelsey Gushue, Kia Neilsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Halfway houses operate as a form of community supervision, offering a unique opportunity for individuals who have offended to receive housing, support, and other resources to aid in navigating the challenges of re-entry from closed custody. Despite being controversial in the eyes of the public, they have long been viewed by stakeholders as a worthwhile intervention. However, existing literature presents mixed findings on their utility. The current study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies providing 17 effect sizes on the effects of halfway houses on recidivism. Findings indicate that halfway houses do not result in any differences for treatment versus comparison group participants with respect to outcomes of arrest (<i>k</i> = 6), conviction (<i>k</i> = 5), or incarceration (<i>k</i> = 6). Additional research is needed to inform best practices for structure and services, and how best to respond to differing participant needs.

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative CriminologyVol. 69(12)
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.