Not Just Surface: Conceptualizing Artful Inquiry via Embroidery

In this article, I conceptualize artful inquiry by answering the question, “What sort of movement does it, as a mode of inquiry, evoke, manifest, or set to work? ” Stitching-with embroidery, theorizations of tension and surface, feminist critiques of the art/craft divide, and discussions of methodological (dis)alignment and (dis)coherence in qualitative inquiry, I argue that artful inquiry is—like embroidery—particularly tensile . Although, in the end, I leave the work ‘unfinished’ (e.g., keeping the messy back visible and the product/process ‘open’), I suggest several things. That, because of its materialities and rhythms—which necessitate and cultivate relationships of, with/in and across difference—embroidery can be particularly useful for making sense of artful inquiry. That, whatever else it is characterized by, artful inquiry is a tensile performance of (in)separability and (dis)connection. And, that engaging with artful inquiry in this manner can attune us to how we work relations of (dis)alignment and (dis)coherence across (qualitative) research design and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251323857
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artistic and Creative Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not Just Surface: Conceptualizing Artful Inquiry via Embroidery

Carlson H. Coogler
1 citations
Qualitative Inquiry
Artistic and Creative Research
26.93
article

Not Just Surface: Conceptualizing Artful Inquiry via Embroidery

Carlson H. Coogler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, I conceptualize artful inquiry by answering the question, “What sort of movement does it, as a mode of inquiry, evoke, manifest, or set to work? ” Stitching-with embroidery, theorizations of tension and surface, feminist critiques of the art/craft divide, and discussions of methodological (dis)alignment and (dis)coherence in qualitative inquiry, I argue that artful inquiry is—like embroidery—particularly tensile . Although, in the end, I leave the work ‘unfinished’ (e.g., keeping the messy back visible and the product/process ‘open’), I suggest several things. That, because of its materialities and rhythms—which necessitate and cultivate relationships of, with/in and across difference—embroidery can be particularly useful for making sense of artful inquiry. That, whatever else it is characterized by, artful inquiry is a tensile performance of (in)separability and (dis)connection. And, that engaging with artful inquiry in this manner can attune us to how we work relations of (dis)alignment and (dis)coherence across (qualitative) research design and practice.

Qualitative InquiryVol. 32(2)
University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artistic and Creative Research
26.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not Just Surface: Conceptualizing Artful Inquiry via Embroidery — Carlson H. Coogler · Qualitative Inquiry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS