Against Standardization: Reflections on Decolonization, Logic and Economics

This paper considers the notion of decolonization through the concerns of epistemic domination and standardization in the context of economics. Exploring the connections between colonization and the drive to standardize across different spheres, it briefly outlines how standardization has occurred in economic theorizing, especially in the mathematical mode. The excessive, unchallenged reliance of economic theory on classical mathematics and logic to formulate economic problems is highlighted. Building on this, it draws from alternative approaches to logic and makes a case for adopting pluralism of logics — and not just of theories and methods — in economics. Overall, we argue for conceiving decolonization as a process not simply of undoing existing colonial influences, but also, by adopting a pluralist approach, of resisting future attempts at epistemic colonization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Mathematics and Natural Computation
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793005726500626
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Against Standardization: Reflections on Decolonization, Logic and Economics

Ragupathy Venkatachalam, Sunil Mitra Kumar, Diviya
New Mathematics and Natural Computation
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Against Standardization: Reflections on Decolonization, Logic and Economics

Ragupathy Venkatachalam, Sunil Mitra Kumar, Diviya
article en

Abstract

This paper considers the notion of decolonization through the concerns of epistemic domination and standardization in the context of economics. Exploring the connections between colonization and the drive to standardize across different spheres, it briefly outlines how standardization has occurred in economic theorizing, especially in the mathematical mode. The excessive, unchallenged reliance of economic theory on classical mathematics and logic to formulate economic problems is highlighted. Building on this, it draws from alternative approaches to logic and makes a case for adopting pluralism of logics — and not just of theories and methods — in economics. Overall, we argue for conceiving decolonization as a process not simply of undoing existing colonial influences, but also, by adopting a pluralist approach, of resisting future attempts at epistemic colonization.

New Mathematics and Natural ComputationVol. 22(04)
Azim Premji University (IN), King's College London (GB), Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Against Standardization: Reflections on Decolonization, Logic and Economics — Ragupathy Venkatachalam, Sunil Mitra Kumar, et al. · New Mathematics and Natural Computation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS