Kenya’s National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance: measuring implementation progress

Kenya has established a multisectoral national action plan (NAP) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which provides a common framework for action by all stakeholders from different sectors in implementing AMR containment activities. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the NAP-AMR has been weak, however, necessitating the development of a multisectoral M&E framework in 2021. Using this M&E tool, Kenya’s highest level technical body charged with containing AMR—the National Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committee (NASIC)—led a review of the NAP-AMR (2017–2022) implementation progress at the national and county levels. The review showed that 16 out of 47 counties had established County Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committees mirroring the NASIC and that 93% (38 out of 41) of the activities listed in the NAP-AMR (2017–2022) and the 2021 M&E framework for human health were either completed or ongoing (compared to 64% [28 out of 44] that were completed or ongoing in the animal and crop sectors). Key challenges identified for the implementation of the NAP-AMR included lack of adequate funding; difficulties in effective collaboration across and within relevant sectors; weak laboratory-clinical interface; erratic supply of laboratory reagents, equipment, and supplies leading to underutilization of microbiology laboratories; and poor internet connectivity at the various facilities negatively affecting transmission of AMR data to the national level. Major learnings and recommendations from the review—strengthening governance arrangements at the national and county level; costing of the NAP-AMR; and ramping up advocacy efforts to political leadership to gather further support for actions on AMR—were integrated into the next iteration of the NAP-AMR (2023–2027), which was released during the World AMR Awareness Week in November 2023. Strengthening the process for monitoring the implementation of the NAP-AMR and cascading that process to the subnational (county) level were identified as critical for a robust operationalization of NAP-AMR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1540713
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kenya’s National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance: measuring implementation progress

Emmanuel Tanui, Niranjan Konduri, Nkatha Gitonga, Allan Azegele et al.
9 citations
Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
11.36
article

Kenya’s National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance: measuring implementation progress

Emmanuel Tanui, Niranjan Konduri, Nkatha Gitonga, Allan Azegele, Ndinda Kusu, Evelyn Wesangula, Tamara Hafner, Mohan P. Joshi, Romona Ndanyi, Joseph Mukoko, Cynthia Odhiambo
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Kenya has established a multisectoral national action plan (NAP) on antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which provides a common framework for action by all stakeholders from different sectors in implementing AMR containment activities. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of the NAP-AMR has been weak, however, necessitating the development of a multisectoral M&E framework in 2021. Using this M&E tool, Kenya’s highest level technical body charged with containing AMR—the National Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committee (NASIC)—led a review of the NAP-AMR (2017–2022) implementation progress at the national and county levels. The review showed that 16 out of 47 counties had established County Antimicrobial Stewardship Interagency Committees mirroring the NASIC and that 93% (38 out of 41) of the activities listed in the NAP-AMR (2017–2022) and the 2021 M&E framework for human health were either completed or ongoing (compared to 64% [28 out of 44] that were completed or ongoing in the animal and crop sectors). Key challenges identified for the implementation of the NAP-AMR included lack of adequate funding; difficulties in effective collaboration across and within relevant sectors; weak laboratory-clinical interface; erratic supply of laboratory reagents, equipment, and supplies leading to underutilization of microbiology laboratories; and poor internet connectivity at the various facilities negatively affecting transmission of AMR data to the national level. Major learnings and recommendations from the review—strengthening governance arrangements at the national and county level; costing of the NAP-AMR; and ramping up advocacy efforts to political leadership to gather further support for actions on AMR—were integrated into the next iteration of the NAP-AMR (2023–2027), which was released during the World AMR Awareness Week in November 2023. Strengthening the process for monitoring the implementation of the NAP-AMR and cascading that process to the subnational (county) level were identified as critical for a robust operationalization of NAP-AMR.

Frontiers in Tropical DiseasesVol. 6
United States Agency for International Development (US), Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries (KE), Partners for Health and Development in Africa (KE), Ministry of Health (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
11.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.