Factors Associated With Marital Satisfaction of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People During the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT Introduction This study investigated the factors associated with the marital satisfaction of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods Study participants were 268 people ( M = 31.63 years of age; SD = 8.33), who self‐reported as lesbian ( n = 112; 41.8%), gay ( n = 85; 31.7%) or bisexual ( n = 71; 26.5%). Of these, 124 (46.3%) reported being cisgender men, and 144 (53.7%) were cisgender women. Participants completed the following online instruments: a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Internalised Homophobia Scale, the COVID‐19 Family Environment Scale (CHES) the Distress Scale, and the Golombok Rust Inventory of Marital State. Results Results demonstrated that experiencing pre‐pandemic contextual and individual vulnerabilities (internalised homophobia, psychological distress, being male, gay, or non‐white), coupled with pandemic‐related external stressors (working from home) and (un)adaptive processes during the pandemic (conflict and cohesion), negatively impacted the marital satisfaction of LGB individuals. Conclusions and Policy Implications This study provides a broader view of how LGB individuals experienced marital relationships during the pandemic, highlighting aspects that may either exacerbate or mitigate the potential adverse effects of the pandemic crisis on relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.70010
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated With Marital Satisfaction of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Ananda Reis Tavares, Normanda Araújo de Morais, Aline Nogueira de Lira, Patrícia Oliveira Lima
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Factors Associated With Marital Satisfaction of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People During the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Ananda Reis Tavares, Normanda Araújo de Morais, Aline Nogueira de Lira, Patrícia Oliveira Lima
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction This study investigated the factors associated with the marital satisfaction of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods Study participants were 268 people ( M = 31.63 years of age; SD = 8.33), who self‐reported as lesbian ( n = 112; 41.8%), gay ( n = 85; 31.7%) or bisexual ( n = 71; 26.5%). Of these, 124 (46.3%) reported being cisgender men, and 144 (53.7%) were cisgender women. Participants completed the following online instruments: a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Internalised Homophobia Scale, the COVID‐19 Family Environment Scale (CHES) the Distress Scale, and the Golombok Rust Inventory of Marital State. Results Results demonstrated that experiencing pre‐pandemic contextual and individual vulnerabilities (internalised homophobia, psychological distress, being male, gay, or non‐white), coupled with pandemic‐related external stressors (working from home) and (un)adaptive processes during the pandemic (conflict and cohesion), negatively impacted the marital satisfaction of LGB individuals. Conclusions and Policy Implications This study provides a broader view of how LGB individuals experienced marital relationships during the pandemic, highlighting aspects that may either exacerbate or mitigate the potential adverse effects of the pandemic crisis on relationships.

Counselling and Psychotherapy ResearchVol. 25(1)
Universidade de Fortaleza (BR)
Universidade de Fortaleza
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.