A Cost Analysis of Antimicrobial Drugs Sold in the Jan Aushadhi Generic Drug Stores in India

Abstract Background: Antimicrobial medications, which are critical for the treatment of infectious diseases, can be prohibitively expensive, especially for the marginalized population. The objective of the present research was to determine cost-minimization analysis (CMA) by comparing Jan Aushadhi (JA) pharmaceuticals marketed in India with the most expensive and least expensive branded alternatives. Materials and Methods: Prices of the most expensive, least expensive branded, and JA medications were obtained from the designated reference sites. The cost difference (CD), cost ratio (CR), and percentage of cost variation (PCV) were calculated in accordance with the guidelines of the cost-minimization study. Results: The cost analysis included 132 drugs/formulations of antimicrobials used as anthelminthic, anti-TB, antibiotic, antifungal, antimalarial, antiprotozoal, antiseptic, and antiviral drugs. Among the antihelminthic medicines, the most expensive albendazole brand was 18.2 times more expensive than JA. The combined formulation of albendazole and ivermectin had a PCV of 67.3% between the costliest and cheapest brands and 280.3% between the costliest and JA brands. Three antitubercular drugs were examined, and the cost variance was low for all medications in the category, with a PCV of 23.5% to 92.6%. Among the 102 antibiotics examined, cefoperazone brand with a PCV of 1497.8 was 16 times pricier than JA. The costliest ciprofloxacin brand cost 11.9 times more than JA. Five antifungals were examined, and itraconazole from JA was 7.8 times cheaper than branded. Among the six antimalarial drugs, artesunate cost 10.1 times more than JA when compared to the more expensive brand. The costliest antiviral drug sofosbuvir cost 4.9 times more than JA. The final analysis suggests that antibiotics had the highest, while antivirals and antiprotozoals had more consistent CD values. Conclusion: The cost-minimization study, which is the first in this field of infectious diseases, indicates the usefulness of JA drugs in reducing financial costs for the patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Infectious Disease Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/cids.cids_29_24
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cost Analysis of Antimicrobial Drugs Sold in the Jan Aushadhi Generic Drug Stores in India

Thomas George, Pankaj Prabhakar, ManjeshwarShrinath Baliga, Dhanya Sacheendran et al.
Journal of Clinical Infectious Disease Society
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

A Cost Analysis of Antimicrobial Drugs Sold in the Jan Aushadhi Generic Drug Stores in India

Thomas George, Pankaj Prabhakar, ManjeshwarShrinath Baliga, Dhanya Sacheendran, Princy Louis Palatty, Abhishek Krishna, Mamatha Jayachander
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Antimicrobial medications, which are critical for the treatment of infectious diseases, can be prohibitively expensive, especially for the marginalized population. The objective of the present research was to determine cost-minimization analysis (CMA) by comparing Jan Aushadhi (JA) pharmaceuticals marketed in India with the most expensive and least expensive branded alternatives. Materials and Methods: Prices of the most expensive, least expensive branded, and JA medications were obtained from the designated reference sites. The cost difference (CD), cost ratio (CR), and percentage of cost variation (PCV) were calculated in accordance with the guidelines of the cost-minimization study. Results: The cost analysis included 132 drugs/formulations of antimicrobials used as anthelminthic, anti-TB, antibiotic, antifungal, antimalarial, antiprotozoal, antiseptic, and antiviral drugs. Among the antihelminthic medicines, the most expensive albendazole brand was 18.2 times more expensive than JA. The combined formulation of albendazole and ivermectin had a PCV of 67.3% between the costliest and cheapest brands and 280.3% between the costliest and JA brands. Three antitubercular drugs were examined, and the cost variance was low for all medications in the category, with a PCV of 23.5% to 92.6%. Among the 102 antibiotics examined, cefoperazone brand with a PCV of 1497.8 was 16 times pricier than JA. The costliest ciprofloxacin brand cost 11.9 times more than JA. Five antifungals were examined, and itraconazole from JA was 7.8 times cheaper than branded. Among the six antimalarial drugs, artesunate cost 10.1 times more than JA when compared to the more expensive brand. The costliest antiviral drug sofosbuvir cost 4.9 times more than JA. The final analysis suggests that antibiotics had the highest, while antivirals and antiprotozoals had more consistent CD values. Conclusion: The cost-minimization study, which is the first in this field of infectious diseases, indicates the usefulness of JA drugs in reducing financial costs for the patient.

Journal of Clinical Infectious Disease SocietyVol. 3(1)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Yenepoya University (IN), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Coney Island Hospital (US), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.