Financial reporting quality and corporate hedging policy: preliminary evidence

Purpose This study evaluates whether firms carry out hedging activities on interest rates and foreign exchange to mitigate the effect of financial constraints caused by the informational disadvantage. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the financial reporting quality is measured with conventional approaches following Dechow, Sloan and Sweeney (1995) and Dechow and Dichev (2002), while the magnitude of hedging activities is measured with textual analysis. In particular, we construct the hedging intensity proxy by counting the relevant keywords on hedging on interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange derivatives (IR/FX). We then compute a standardized ratio of the number of hedging keywords counted relative to its peers in the same industry and use this standardized ratio to proxy for hedging activities taken by the firm. Our baseline analysis will test the relationship between firms’ financial reporting quality and hedging activities. We will further test whether this relationship varies across the subsamples partitioned by the hedging need. Our last analysis will test how the hedging activities moderate the underinvestment in firms with low financial reporting quality. Findings We find that firms with low financial reporting quality have more hedging activities, as measured by our keyword count proxy. Furthermore, we find the low financial reporting quality firms that are more financially constrained, located in competitive industries, and have better corporate governance provisions undertake more hedging activities. Lastly, we find that firms that undertake hedging activities invest more. Originality/value This study is related to the literature that examines the real effects of financial reporting quality. When most studies on financial reporting quality examine its effects on investment, financing and liquidity management, few studies have investigated corporate hedging policies. Given that risk management through financial hedging has become increasingly important and widely used in many large corporations, it is important to extend the studies on the real effect of financial reporting to the hedging activities. In addition, this study is also related to the finance literature that examines the economic determinants and consequences of firms’ hedging policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Accounting and Finance Review
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-09-2024-0156
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Financial reporting quality and corporate hedging policy: preliminary evidence

Sipeng Chen, Yuan Huang
1 citations
China Accounting and Finance Review
Risk Management in Financial Firms
3.91
article

Financial reporting quality and corporate hedging policy: preliminary evidence

Sipeng Chen, Yuan Huang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates whether firms carry out hedging activities on interest rates and foreign exchange to mitigate the effect of financial constraints caused by the informational disadvantage. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the financial reporting quality is measured with conventional approaches following Dechow, Sloan and Sweeney (1995) and Dechow and Dichev (2002), while the magnitude of hedging activities is measured with textual analysis. In particular, we construct the hedging intensity proxy by counting the relevant keywords on hedging on interest rate derivatives and foreign exchange derivatives (IR/FX). We then compute a standardized ratio of the number of hedging keywords counted relative to its peers in the same industry and use this standardized ratio to proxy for hedging activities taken by the firm. Our baseline analysis will test the relationship between firms’ financial reporting quality and hedging activities. We will further test whether this relationship varies across the subsamples partitioned by the hedging need. Our last analysis will test how the hedging activities moderate the underinvestment in firms with low financial reporting quality. Findings We find that firms with low financial reporting quality have more hedging activities, as measured by our keyword count proxy. Furthermore, we find the low financial reporting quality firms that are more financially constrained, located in competitive industries, and have better corporate governance provisions undertake more hedging activities. Lastly, we find that firms that undertake hedging activities invest more. Originality/value This study is related to the literature that examines the real effects of financial reporting quality. When most studies on financial reporting quality examine its effects on investment, financing and liquidity management, few studies have investigated corporate hedging policies. Given that risk management through financial hedging has become increasingly important and widely used in many large corporations, it is important to extend the studies on the real effect of financial reporting to the hedging activities. In addition, this study is also related to the finance literature that examines the economic determinants and consequences of firms’ hedging policies.

China Accounting and Finance ReviewVol. 27(2)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.