Effect of Unit Cell Design and Volume Fraction of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures on Compressive Response and Orthopedics Screw Pullout Strength

We aimed to evaluate the effects of unit cell design and the volume fraction of 3D-printed lattice structures with relative densities of 30% or 45% on compressive response and orthopedics screw pullout strength. All 3D lattice models were created using FLatt Pack software (version 3.31.0.0). The unit cell size of sheet-based triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs)-Gyroid and Schwarz Diamond-was 5.08 mm, whereas that of skeletal TPMS-Skeletal Gyroid, Skeletal Schwarz Diamond, and Skeletal Schoen I-Wrapped Package-was scaled down to 3.175 and 2.54 mm. Two photopolymer resin types-Rigid 10k and Standard Grey-were used. In uniaxial compression tests, Rigid 10k resin lattices failed at relatively lower strains (<0.11), while Standard Grey lattices endured higher strains (>0.60) and experienced less softening effects, resulting in stress-strain curve plateauing followed by lattice densification. ANOVA revealed significant effects of design and volume fraction at <i>p</i> < 0.001 on compressive modulus, screw pullout strength, and screw withdrawal stiffness of the 3D-printed lattice. The pullout load from 3D-printed lattices (61.00-2839.42 N) was higher than that from open-cell polyurethane foam (<50 N) and lower than that of human bone of similar volume fraction (1134-2293 N). These findings demonstrate that 3D-printed lattices can be tailored to approximate different bone densities, enabling more realistic orthopedic and dental training models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061349
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Unit Cell Design and Volume Fraction of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures on Compressive Response and Orthopedics Screw Pullout Strength

Patcharawan Silthampitag, Pisaisit Chaijareenont, Boonyanuch Suksawang
2 citations
Materials
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
article

Effect of Unit Cell Design and Volume Fraction of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures on Compressive Response and Orthopedics Screw Pullout Strength

Patcharawan Silthampitag, Pisaisit Chaijareenont, Boonyanuch Suksawang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effects of unit cell design and the volume fraction of 3D-printed lattice structures with relative densities of 30% or 45% on compressive response and orthopedics screw pullout strength. All 3D lattice models were created using FLatt Pack software (version 3.31.0.0). The unit cell size of sheet-based triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs)-Gyroid and Schwarz Diamond-was 5.08 mm, whereas that of skeletal TPMS-Skeletal Gyroid, Skeletal Schwarz Diamond, and Skeletal Schoen I-Wrapped Package-was scaled down to 3.175 and 2.54 mm. Two photopolymer resin types-Rigid 10k and Standard Grey-were used. In uniaxial compression tests, Rigid 10k resin lattices failed at relatively lower strains (<0.11), while Standard Grey lattices endured higher strains (>0.60) and experienced less softening effects, resulting in stress-strain curve plateauing followed by lattice densification. ANOVA revealed significant effects of design and volume fraction at <i>p</i> < 0.001 on compressive modulus, screw pullout strength, and screw withdrawal stiffness of the 3D-printed lattice. The pullout load from 3D-printed lattices (61.00-2839.42 N) was higher than that from open-cell polyurethane foam (<50 N) and lower than that of human bone of similar volume fraction (1134-2293 N). These findings demonstrate that 3D-printed lattices can be tailored to approximate different bone densities, enabling more realistic orthopedic and dental training models.

MaterialsVol. 18(6)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.