Digital innovations for public sector accounting reforms: comparative insights from collaborative efforts

Purpose This study draws on collaborative public sector innovation to examine the adoption of digital innovations as enablers of public sector accounting reforms. The aim is to shed light on three dimensions of the collaborative process: (1) the actors of collaboration and their roles, (2) the governance and accountability of collaborative networks and (3) the success of the constructs of collaboration in relation to the timing of actors’ involvement and the adherence to the agreed timeframe. Design/methodology/approach Our research combines the analysis of publicly available documents with written and oral interviews of senior officials of the Ministries of Finance of four central governments: Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta. Findings The results identify the involvement of multiple actors across all stages of the innovation process. In addition, the findings show that the actors’ roles vary across stages. Regarding the governance of collaborative networks, we find evidence of shared governance in all cases and meta-governance strategies developed by public actors to improve coordination and safeguard accountability. Practical implications The study adds to the existing literature on collaborative public sector innovation by providing insights into the changing roles and governance configurations across the different stages of the innovation process. Originality/value This is the first study using collaborative public sector innovation to explore digital innovations supporting public-sector accounting reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Published
2025-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-09-2024-0181
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital innovations for public sector accounting reforms: comparative insights from collaborative efforts

Αντωνία Μαρκογιαννοπούλου, Michalis Bekiaris, Thekla Paraponti, Foteini Spanou
2 citations
Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
article

Digital innovations for public sector accounting reforms: comparative insights from collaborative efforts

Αντωνία Μαρκογιαννοπούλου, Michalis Bekiaris, Thekla Paraponti, Foteini Spanou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study draws on collaborative public sector innovation to examine the adoption of digital innovations as enablers of public sector accounting reforms. The aim is to shed light on three dimensions of the collaborative process: (1) the actors of collaboration and their roles, (2) the governance and accountability of collaborative networks and (3) the success of the constructs of collaboration in relation to the timing of actors’ involvement and the adherence to the agreed timeframe. Design/methodology/approach Our research combines the analysis of publicly available documents with written and oral interviews of senior officials of the Ministries of Finance of four central governments: Cyprus, Greece, Italy and Malta. Findings The results identify the involvement of multiple actors across all stages of the innovation process. In addition, the findings show that the actors’ roles vary across stages. Regarding the governance of collaborative networks, we find evidence of shared governance in all cases and meta-governance strategies developed by public actors to improve coordination and safeguard accountability. Practical implications The study adds to the existing literature on collaborative public sector innovation by providing insights into the changing roles and governance configurations across the different stages of the innovation process. Originality/value This is the first study using collaborative public sector innovation to explore digital innovations supporting public-sector accounting reforms.

Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial ManagementVol. 38(1)
University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Public Policy and Administration Research
7.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.