Comparison of enucleation efficiency of HoLEP with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between the learning curve period and after becoming proficient in HoLEP

Objective: To compare prostate enucleation efficiency using Holmium laser (HoLEP) with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between a learning curve and experienced group and to evaluate factors required to ensure proficiency. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent En Bloc HoLEP with early apical release by a single surgeon (CL) at Thammasat University Hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The primary outcome was a comparison of enucleation efficiency (EE). EE was calculated by dividing the weight of enucleated prostatic tissue (g) by the enucleation time (min). Secondary outcomes were hematocrit (Hct) change, one-month postoperative maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reduction, catheter time (CT; day), length of hospital stay (LOS; day), morcellation efficiency (ME; calculate by dividing enucleated tissue weight (grams) by the morcellation time) and post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurrence. The 120 cases were divided into a learning curve group of 60 cases and an experienced group of 60 cases. Mean EE & ME, post-operative Hct change, IPSS reduction, Qmax, CT, LOS and post-operative SUI were compared. Results: The median (IQR) prostate weight in the learning curve group vs the experienced group was 66 (50.5-101) g vs 69 (50-95) g. Demographic and clinical data differed significantly between groups. Mean EE was significantly different between the learning curve group vs the experienced group (0.76 g/min vs 0.92 g/min (p = 0.021), respectively) after experience of 60 cases. Mean CT and LOS were decreased in the experienced group. Mean ME improved slightly but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The number of cases required to become proficient at the early apical released En Bloc technique of HoLEP is 60 cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Insight Urology
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.89
Primary Topic
Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of enucleation efficiency of HoLEP with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between the learning curve period and after becoming proficient in HoLEP

Chonlatee Roekmongkolwit, Chatchawet Liwrotsap
Insight Urology
Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
article

Comparison of enucleation efficiency of HoLEP with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between the learning curve period and after becoming proficient in HoLEP

Chonlatee Roekmongkolwit, Chatchawet Liwrotsap
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare prostate enucleation efficiency using Holmium laser (HoLEP) with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between a learning curve and experienced group and to evaluate factors required to ensure proficiency. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent En Bloc HoLEP with early apical release by a single surgeon (CL) at Thammasat University Hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The primary outcome was a comparison of enucleation efficiency (EE). EE was calculated by dividing the weight of enucleated prostatic tissue (g) by the enucleation time (min). Secondary outcomes were hematocrit (Hct) change, one-month postoperative maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reduction, catheter time (CT; day), length of hospital stay (LOS; day), morcellation efficiency (ME; calculate by dividing enucleated tissue weight (grams) by the morcellation time) and post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurrence. The 120 cases were divided into a learning curve group of 60 cases and an experienced group of 60 cases. Mean EE & ME, post-operative Hct change, IPSS reduction, Qmax, CT, LOS and post-operative SUI were compared. Results: The median (IQR) prostate weight in the learning curve group vs the experienced group was 66 (50.5-101) g vs 69 (50-95) g. Demographic and clinical data differed significantly between groups. Mean EE was significantly different between the learning curve group vs the experienced group (0.76 g/min vs 0.92 g/min (p = 0.021), respectively) after experience of 60 cases. Mean CT and LOS were decreased in the experienced group. Mean ME improved slightly but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The number of cases required to become proficient at the early apical released En Bloc technique of HoLEP is 60 cases.

Insight UrologyVol. 45(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of enucleation efficiency of HoLEP with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between the learning curve period and after becoming proficient in HoLEP — Chonlatee Roekmongkolwit, Chatchawet Liwrotsap · Insight Urology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS