Revisión sistemática de la competencia argumentativa a través de diferentes modelos y estrategias pedagógicas

In this article, a systematic review of the concept of argumentative competence is carried out, focusing on the models implemented for it to be learned. To this end, two types of analysis are made: a bibliometric analysis and a documentary analysis. It was observed a constant decrease in the number of written articles about argumentative competence. On the other hand, it was identified analytical trends regarding the study of this concept: research in Latin America usually depicts a qualitative methodology that analyzes the fundamental parts of argumentation, while research in other regions of the world, such as China and the United States, commonly shows a quantitative approach and explores some phenomena external to argumentation. Finally, the articles show that the use of argumentative models is useful to develop argumentative competence in university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educación y ciencia
Published
2024-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32776/eyc.v13i62.775
Primary Topic
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisión sistemática de la competencia argumentativa a través de diferentes modelos y estrategias pedagógicas

Rosario Bonilla, Iván Galicia Isasmendi
Educación y ciencia
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
article

Revisión sistemática de la competencia argumentativa a través de diferentes modelos y estrategias pedagógicas

Rosario Bonilla, Iván Galicia Isasmendi
article en

Abstract

In this article, a systematic review of the concept of argumentative competence is carried out, focusing on the models implemented for it to be learned. To this end, two types of analysis are made: a bibliometric analysis and a documentary analysis. It was observed a constant decrease in the number of written articles about argumentative competence. On the other hand, it was identified analytical trends regarding the study of this concept: research in Latin America usually depicts a qualitative methodology that analyzes the fundamental parts of argumentation, while research in other regions of the world, such as China and the United States, commonly shows a quantitative approach and explores some phenomena external to argumentation. Finally, the articles show that the use of argumentative models is useful to develop argumentative competence in university students.

Educación y cienciaVol. 13(62)
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.