Revisión sistemática de la competencia argumentativa a través de diferentes modelos y estrategias pedagógicas
In this article, a systematic review of the concept of argumentative competence is carried out, focusing on the models implemented for it to be learned. To this end, two types of analysis are made: a bibliometric analysis and a documentary analysis. It was observed a constant decrease in the number of written articles about argumentative competence. On the other hand, it was identified analytical trends regarding the study of this concept: research in Latin America usually depicts a qualitative methodology that analyzes the fundamental parts of argumentation, while research in other regions of the world, such as China and the United States, commonly shows a quantitative approach and explores some phenomena external to argumentation. Finally, the articles show that the use of argumentative models is useful to develop argumentative competence in university students.
Authors
- Rosario Bonilla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-8584)
- Iván Galicia Isasmendi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2262-1188)
Institutions
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Educación y ciencia
- Published
- 2024-12-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.32776/eyc.v13i62.775
- Primary Topic
- Higher Education Teaching and Evaluation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00