AI-based assessment of students’ writing skill progress: Implementing “Artificial neural network modeling” vs. “Time series prediction”

• Comparison of GRNN and MLFN in prediction of students’ L2 writing scores. • 34 participants are investigated in terms of their L2 writing progress. • Implementation of artificial intelligence in language learning and assessment. • 8 independent variables are taken as inputs and 1 dependent output is selected. • GRNN without linear predictor is determined as the best AI model with R 2 = 0.88 and RMSE = 0.99. This study evaluates two prediction models to assess the students’ progress in second language (L2) writing skills through AI-based applications. The study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) including Multi-Layer Feedforward Networks (MLFN) and Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN), versus time series prediction methods. A total of 34 cases from two groups (an experimental and a control group) participated in a writing pretest, 6 periodic tests and a posttest were analyzed in terms of their writing skill development through different methods. The findings indicated that GRNN without linear predictors for training portion, with mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.807, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.99 and R 2 = 0.88, outperforming the time series models, provided the most accurate and the closest scores to the posttest indicating that the experimental group improved more than the control group. The GRNN shows better performance with predictor in testing portion of data underscored with R 2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 0.762. The study emphasizes the importance of applying artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) particularly in English language learning and assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102575
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-based assessment of students’ writing skill progress: Implementing “Artificial neural network modeling” vs. “Time series prediction”

Fatemeh Etaat
2 citations
International Journal of Educational Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

AI-based assessment of students’ writing skill progress: Implementing “Artificial neural network modeling” vs. “Time series prediction”

Fatemeh Etaat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Comparison of GRNN and MLFN in prediction of students’ L2 writing scores. • 34 participants are investigated in terms of their L2 writing progress. • Implementation of artificial intelligence in language learning and assessment. • 8 independent variables are taken as inputs and 1 dependent output is selected. • GRNN without linear predictor is determined as the best AI model with R 2 = 0.88 and RMSE = 0.99. This study evaluates two prediction models to assess the students’ progress in second language (L2) writing skills through AI-based applications. The study compares Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) including Multi-Layer Feedforward Networks (MLFN) and Generalized Regression Neural Networks (GRNN), versus time series prediction methods. A total of 34 cases from two groups (an experimental and a control group) participated in a writing pretest, 6 periodic tests and a posttest were analyzed in terms of their writing skill development through different methods. The findings indicated that GRNN without linear predictors for training portion, with mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.807, a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.99 and R 2 = 0.88, outperforming the time series models, provided the most accurate and the closest scores to the posttest indicating that the experimental group improved more than the control group. The GRNN shows better performance with predictor in testing portion of data underscored with R 2 = 0.94 and RMSE = 0.762. The study emphasizes the importance of applying artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) particularly in English language learning and assessment.

International Journal of Educational ResearchVol. 131
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.