<scp>MaOAOA</scp> : A Novel Many‐Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems

ABSTRACT Currently, the use of multi‐objective optimization algorithms has been applied in many fields to find the efficient solution of the multiple objective optimization problems (MOPs). However, this reduces their efficiency when addressing MaOPs, which are problems that contain more than three objectives; this is because the portion of the Pareto frontier solutions tends to increase exponentially with the number of objectives. This paper aims at overcoming this problem by proposing a new Many‐Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (MaOAOA) that incorporates a reference point, niche preservation, and an information feedback mechanism (IFM). They did this in a manner that splits the convergence and the diversity phases in the middle of the cycle. The first phase deals with the convergence using a reference point approach, which aims to move the population towards the true Pareto Front. However, the diversity phase of the MaOAOA uses a niche preserve to the archive truncation method in the population, thus guaranteeing that the population is spread out properly along the actual Pareto front. These stages are mutual; that is, the convergence stage supports the diversity stage, and they are balanced by an (IFM) approach. The experimental results show that MaOAOA outperforms several approaches, including MaOTLBO, NSGA‐III, MaOPSO, and MOEA/D‐DRW, in terms of GD, IGD, SP, SD, HV, and RT metrics. This can be seen from the MaF1‐MaF15 test problems, especially with four, seven, and nine objectives, and five real‐world problems that include RWMaOP1 to RWMaOP5. The findings indicate that MaOAOA outperforms the other algorithms in most of the test cases analyzed in this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70077
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MaOAOA : A Novel Many‐Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems

Arpita Arpita, Sundaram B. Pandya, G. Gulothungan, Mohammad Khishe et al.
3 citations
Engineering Reports
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
4.51
article

MaOAOA : A Novel Many‐Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Solving Engineering Problems

Arpita Arpita, Sundaram B. Pandya, G. Gulothungan, Mohammad Khishe, Pradeep Jangir, Bhargavi Indrajit Trivedi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Currently, the use of multi‐objective optimization algorithms has been applied in many fields to find the efficient solution of the multiple objective optimization problems (MOPs). However, this reduces their efficiency when addressing MaOPs, which are problems that contain more than three objectives; this is because the portion of the Pareto frontier solutions tends to increase exponentially with the number of objectives. This paper aims at overcoming this problem by proposing a new Many‐Objective Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (MaOAOA) that incorporates a reference point, niche preservation, and an information feedback mechanism (IFM). They did this in a manner that splits the convergence and the diversity phases in the middle of the cycle. The first phase deals with the convergence using a reference point approach, which aims to move the population towards the true Pareto Front. However, the diversity phase of the MaOAOA uses a niche preserve to the archive truncation method in the population, thus guaranteeing that the population is spread out properly along the actual Pareto front. These stages are mutual; that is, the convergence stage supports the diversity stage, and they are balanced by an (IFM) approach. The experimental results show that MaOAOA outperforms several approaches, including MaOTLBO, NSGA‐III, MaOPSO, and MOEA/D‐DRW, in terms of GD, IGD, SP, SD, HV, and RT metrics. This can be seen from the MaF1‐MaF15 test problems, especially with four, seven, and nine objectives, and five real‐world problems that include RWMaOP1 to RWMaOP5. The findings indicate that MaOAOA outperforms the other algorithms in most of the test cases analyzed in this study.

Engineering ReportsVol. 7(3)
Chandigarh University (IN), SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Applied Science Private University (JO), Jadara University (JO), Government of Gujarat (IN), Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology (IR), Graphic Era University (IN), Chitkara University (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.