Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power

Reflecting a broader movement toward knowledge democratization, coproducing Cochrane evidence with interest holders outside universities is increasingly encouraged. However, only limited research exists on the approaches used to coproduce Cochrane reviews. Furthermore, the outcomes of coproduction are rarely described. In this commentary, we aim to address these gaps by describing the process and outcomes of coproduction used in a recently published Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). We also reflect on power imbalances in our coproduction approach and how these could be minimized in future review coproduction activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power

Rebecca Ryan, Bronwen Merner
1 citations
Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
article

Coproducing a Cochrane Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Process, Outcomes, and Reflections on Power

Rebecca Ryan, Bronwen Merner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reflecting a broader movement toward knowledge democratization, coproducing Cochrane evidence with interest holders outside universities is increasingly encouraged. However, only limited research exists on the approaches used to coproduce Cochrane reviews. Furthermore, the outcomes of coproduction are rarely described. In this commentary, we aim to address these gaps by describing the process and outcomes of coproduction used in a recently published Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). We also reflect on power imbalances in our coproduction approach and how these could be minimized in future review coproduction activities.

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and MethodsVol. 3(2)
La Trobe University (AU)
La Trobe University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.