Patterns and magnitudes of offsetting ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by CH<sub>4</sub> emissions in coastal salt marshes

<p indent="0mm">Coastal salt marsh is an important blue carbon ecosystem that efficiently removes carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the atmosphere. However, the coastal salt marsh is also a significant source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), which has a higher heat-trapping capacity than CO<sub>2</sub> over 20-year and 100-year scales, and may partially offset the net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. Using static flux chambers of different opacities, we measured the net ecosystem exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> (NEE) and ecosystem respiration (ER) under four different light levels (100, 80, 50, 30 and 0% ambient light) with a Licor-7810 CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> analyzer, monthly at midday in a <italic>Scirpus mariqueter</italic> salt marsh and a <italic>Phragmites australis</italic> salt marsh within the Minjiang River Estuary National Nature Reserve, China. Based on the results, we established empirical models between gross primary productivity (GPP) and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), and between ER and air temperature. Finally, using PAR and air temperature data from a meteorological station within the reserve, we estimated the GPP, ER and NEE at <sc>15 min</sc> intervals and extrapolated the results to monthly- and annually-integrated NEE and ER. We also measured CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes monthly at midday with the static flux chambers in the two salt marshes, and estimated the daily CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes based on a day-to-night ratio of 1.62 for CH<sub>4</sub> flux in the Minjiang River estuary salt marsh. Both <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> and <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> salt marshes exhibited distinct diurnal and seasonal variations in NEE and ER. Both salt marshes acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sinks, with annual NEE of −1673.7±<sc>122.7 g</sc> CO<sc><sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup></sc> and −5550.0±<sc>130.1 g</sc> CO<sc><sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>,</sc> respectively. <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> salt marsh acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sinks in all four seasons; however, <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> salt marsh acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sources in winter. CH<sub>4</sub> flux at midday was <sc>0.01–1.7 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup></sc> in <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh and <sc>2.4–9.4 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup></sc> in <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh, and the annually-integrated flux was <sc>5.3±0.1 g</sc> CH<sc><sub>4</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup></sc> and <sc>39.5±0.3 g</sc> CH<sc><sub>4</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>,</sc> respectively. Based on the global warming potential (GWP) of CH<sub>4</sub>, the annual CH<sub>4</sub> emission from <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh would offset 8.6% (over a 20-year time horizon) to 25.2% (over a 100-year time horizon) of its net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, with the highest offset occurring in autumn (22.4%–66.1%) and the lowest offset occurring in spring (3.2%–9.4%). For <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh, CH<sub>4</sub> emission would offset 19.2% to 56.7% of its net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, with the highest offset occurring in winter (54.9%–161.9%) and the lowest offset occurring in autumn (23.6%–69.7%). Based on GWP<sub>100</sub> for CH<sub>4</sub> emission, the carbon sink rate for <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh was <?A3B2 pi6?><sc>1530.6 g</sc> CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>, with a net carbon release in winter. Likewise, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh carbon sink rate was <sc>4483.5 g</sc> CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>, with a net carbon uptake in all four seasons. This study showed that, although CH<sub>4</sub> emission from coastal salt marshes would partially offset the ecosystem’s radiative cooling effect, coastal salt marsh ecosystem still plays a significant role as carbon sinks and contributes to mitigating global climate change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1360/tb-2024-1345
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns and magnitudes of offsetting ecosystem CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; uptake by CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions in coastal salt marshes

Jun Gao, Fang Shan, Jiafang Huang, Yixuan Yu et al.
1 citations
Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
article

Patterns and magnitudes of offsetting ecosystem CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; uptake by CH&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; emissions in coastal salt marshes

Jun Gao, Fang Shan, Jiafang Huang, Yixuan Yu, Li Lin, Wei-Yang Lin, Chuan Tong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<p indent="0mm">Coastal salt marsh is an important blue carbon ecosystem that efficiently removes carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) from the atmosphere. However, the coastal salt marsh is also a significant source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), which has a higher heat-trapping capacity than CO<sub>2</sub> over 20-year and 100-year scales, and may partially offset the net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. Using static flux chambers of different opacities, we measured the net ecosystem exchange of CO<sub>2</sub> (NEE) and ecosystem respiration (ER) under four different light levels (100, 80, 50, 30 and 0% ambient light) with a Licor-7810 CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> analyzer, monthly at midday in a <italic>Scirpus mariqueter</italic> salt marsh and a <italic>Phragmites australis</italic> salt marsh within the Minjiang River Estuary National Nature Reserve, China. Based on the results, we established empirical models between gross primary productivity (GPP) and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), and between ER and air temperature. Finally, using PAR and air temperature data from a meteorological station within the reserve, we estimated the GPP, ER and NEE at <sc>15 min</sc> intervals and extrapolated the results to monthly- and annually-integrated NEE and ER. We also measured CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes monthly at midday with the static flux chambers in the two salt marshes, and estimated the daily CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes based on a day-to-night ratio of 1.62 for CH<sub>4</sub> flux in the Minjiang River estuary salt marsh. Both <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> and <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> salt marshes exhibited distinct diurnal and seasonal variations in NEE and ER. Both salt marshes acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sinks, with annual NEE of −1673.7±<sc>122.7 g</sc> CO<sc><sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup></sc> and −5550.0±<sc>130.1 g</sc> CO<sc><sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>,</sc> respectively. <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> salt marsh acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sinks in all four seasons; however, <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> salt marsh acted as net CO<sub>2</sub> sources in winter. CH<sub>4</sub> flux at midday was <sc>0.01–1.7 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup></sc> in <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh and <sc>2.4–9.4 mg m<sup>−2</sup> h<sup>−1</sup></sc> in <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh, and the annually-integrated flux was <sc>5.3±0.1 g</sc> CH<sc><sub>4</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup></sc> and <sc>39.5±0.3 g</sc> CH<sc><sub>4</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>,</sc> respectively. Based on the global warming potential (GWP) of CH<sub>4</sub>, the annual CH<sub>4</sub> emission from <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh would offset 8.6% (over a 20-year time horizon) to 25.2% (over a 100-year time horizon) of its net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, with the highest offset occurring in autumn (22.4%–66.1%) and the lowest offset occurring in spring (3.2%–9.4%). For <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh, CH<sub>4</sub> emission would offset 19.2% to 56.7% of its net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, with the highest offset occurring in winter (54.9%–161.9%) and the lowest offset occurring in autumn (23.6%–69.7%). Based on GWP<sub>100</sub> for CH<sub>4</sub> emission, the carbon sink rate for <italic>S</italic>. <italic>mariqueter</italic> marsh was <?A3B2 pi6?><sc>1530.6 g</sc> CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>, with a net carbon release in winter. Likewise, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>australis</italic> marsh carbon sink rate was <sc>4483.5 g</sc> CO<sub>2</sub>-eq m<sup>−2</sup> a<sup>−1</sup>, with a net carbon uptake in all four seasons. This study showed that, although CH<sub>4</sub> emission from coastal salt marshes would partially offset the ecosystem’s radiative cooling effect, coastal salt marsh ecosystem still plays a significant role as carbon sinks and contributes to mitigating global climate change.

Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)Vol. 70(24)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.