Letters directionality effects on the inhibition of mirror generalization in the recognition of objects: evidence from the negative priming paradigm

Abstract Previous studies have shown that inhibiting the mirror generalization mechanism in recognizing letters/words containing reversible and non-reversible letters has a right-asymmetry bias. In this paper, we analysed for the first time whether this bias can also be observed in the visual recognition of objects as a “collateral” effect of literacy on cognition. To test this, we asked participants to decide whether pairs of letters (used as primes) and pairs of animals (used as probes) were the same or different. Probes of identical (and non-identical) animals presented in mirror and non-mirror positions were preceded by right- or left-oriented reversible and non-reversible letters. Results showed that participants were slower at recognizing images of the same animals presented in mirror than in non-mirror positions (indicative of a negative priming effect) when they were preceded by right-oriented reversible and by left-oriented non-reversible letters, suggesting that the directionality of the letters impact object recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading and Writing
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10644-w
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Letters directionality effects on the inhibition of mirror generalization in the recognition of objects: evidence from the negative priming paradigm

Ana Paula Soares, Helena M. Oliveira, Ana Duarte Campos, Maria Veiga de Araújo
Reading and Writing
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Letters directionality effects on the inhibition of mirror generalization in the recognition of objects: evidence from the negative priming paradigm

Ana Paula Soares, Helena M. Oliveira, Ana Duarte Campos, Maria Veiga de Araújo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies have shown that inhibiting the mirror generalization mechanism in recognizing letters/words containing reversible and non-reversible letters has a right-asymmetry bias. In this paper, we analysed for the first time whether this bias can also be observed in the visual recognition of objects as a “collateral” effect of literacy on cognition. To test this, we asked participants to decide whether pairs of letters (used as primes) and pairs of animals (used as probes) were the same or different. Probes of identical (and non-identical) animals presented in mirror and non-mirror positions were preceded by right- or left-oriented reversible and non-reversible letters. Results showed that participants were slower at recognizing images of the same animals presented in mirror than in non-mirror positions (indicative of a negative priming effect) when they were preceded by right-oriented reversible and by left-oriented non-reversible letters, suggesting that the directionality of the letters impact object recognition.

Reading and Writing
University of Greater Manchester (GB), University of Minho (PT)
Universidade do Minho, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.