Trapping and re‐educating bold wolves in the European Union: Obligatory and illegal at the same time?

Abstract Effective wolf conservation requires effective measures to prevent and address problematic behaviour displayed by wolves towards people (and pets) – and by people towards wolves. Such action appears to be required by European nature conservation legislation – the Bern Convention on European Wildlife Conservation and the EU Habitats Directive in particular – read in light of international best practice recommendations. To this end, ‘soft‐catch’ leghold traps appear to be indispensable in efforts to capture, radio‐collar and aversively condition ‘bold wolves’. The 1991 EU Leghold Trap Regulation, however, contains a general leghold trap prohibition. This article explores both sides of the story and addresses the question of whether there is a way out of the apparent conflict of laws, and whether the use of soft‐catch leghold traps for research and conservation purposes may be legally defensible after all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Published
2025-03-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12609
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trapping and re‐educating bold wolves in the European Union: Obligatory and illegal at the same time?

Arie Trouwborst
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

Trapping and re‐educating bold wolves in the European Union: Obligatory and illegal at the same time?

Arie Trouwborst
article en

Abstract

Abstract Effective wolf conservation requires effective measures to prevent and address problematic behaviour displayed by wolves towards people (and pets) – and by people towards wolves. Such action appears to be required by European nature conservation legislation – the Bern Convention on European Wildlife Conservation and the EU Habitats Directive in particular – read in light of international best practice recommendations. To this end, ‘soft‐catch’ leghold traps appear to be indispensable in efforts to capture, radio‐collar and aversively condition ‘bold wolves’. The 1991 EU Leghold Trap Regulation, however, contains a general leghold trap prohibition. This article explores both sides of the story and addresses the question of whether there is a way out of the apparent conflict of laws, and whether the use of soft‐catch leghold traps for research and conservation purposes may be legally defensible after all.

Review of European Comparative & International Environmental LawVol. 34(1)
Tilburg University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.